Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Jewish Christianity

In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “term which can have two meanings”. Today it says “bout the historical concept”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “term which can have two meanings”. Today it says “bout the historical concept”.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

Jewish Christians (sometimes called also "Hebrew Christians" or "Christian Jews" , but see below for differences) is a term which can have two meanings, an historical one and a contemporary one. Both meanings will be given below, from a Christian context. The term "Jewish Christians" is often used by contemporary Christians in discussing early Church history. Major Christian denominations readily admit that Jesus , his Apostles , and all or essentially all of his early followers were Jewish . Hence the 3,000 converts on the Pentecost following the Crucifixion described in Acts 2 were all Jews, plus some proselytes (who were always called that and not "Jews"). The history recorded further in the book of Acts shows all converts to Christianity to have been Jewish prior to the discussion of the conversion of the Roman officer Cornelius in Acts 10. The only division within the Church at that time was between Hellenistic and non-Hellenistic Jews (Acts 6). However, after the conversion of Cornelius and his acceptance as a Christian, there was now another group — Gentile Christians. Much of the early controversy in the Church was over the issue of whether Gentiles could enter the Church directly or ought to first convert to Judaism. Note that this controversy was fought between largely between opposing groups of Christians who were themselves ethnically Jewish. Those who felt that this conversion to Judaism was a prerequisite for Church membership were eventually condemned by Paul as " judaizing teachers ". This was related to a larger issue (which is still discussed today) — were Jewish converts to Christianity still in fact Jews themselves, or had their acceptance of Jesus as Messiah in contravention to the established Jewish leadership caused them to have voluntarily ceased being Jews? If so, the term "Jewish Christian" is something of an oxymoron. "Jewish Christians" today are persons who are ethnically Jewish but who have become part of a "mainstream" Christian group which is not predominantly based on an appeal to Jewish ethnicity or the Law of Moses . This term is used as a contrast to Messianic Jews , a majority of whom are ethnic Jews who have converted to a religion in which Christian belief (often of a very evangelical nature) is generally engrafted onto Jewish ritual which would, to outsiders at least, typically resemble Judaism more than Christianity. A well known Hebrew Christian is the theologian Arnold Fruchtenbaum , the founder of Ariel Ministries . He is not generally known as a Messianic Jew but is not unhappy about being labelled as one either. Many Jewish leaders regard this movement, represented if not typified by groups such as " Jews for Jesus ", as more of a threat to legitimate Judaism than the one posed by efforts to convert Jews to a more mainstream Christianity, which have been ongoing for centuries; "Messianic Judaism" is largely a phenomenon of the latter part of the 20th century . Others disagree and feel that cultural assimilation rather than any form of conversion is the greatest enemy now facing Judaism.1

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 16626950.
Today
In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “term which can have two meanings”. Today it says “bout the historical concept”. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2005 and 2025.

Then

term which can have two meanings

Now

bout the historical concept

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report