Wikipedia's first sentence called it “hint found in the hebrew bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given jewish law”. Today it says “allusion found in the hebrew bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other halakha”. The one-line description Wikipedia serves to search engines and AI systems read “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible”. It now reads “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible In Talmudical hermeneutics”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2025 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2025
Asmachta . In Talmudical hermeneutics , asmachta is an allusion found in the Hebrew Bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other Halakha . It's an exception in the talmudical hermeneutics, since it doesn't base the law on the cited verse, but uses the verse as a hint. Sometimes it isn't clear whether the verse has been quoted as an asmachta or as a source, which can lead to controversy over the de'oraita or derabanan quality of the law. An example of such a case is the controversy over berakhah she'eina tzricha or berakhah levatala , the prohibition to say a prayer outside its context. The Talmud says "Anyone who recites an unnecessary blessing violates the biblical prohibition: Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain ". While Maimonides sees it as a source, the Tosafists see it as an asmachta . Berachot 33a Mishneh Torah , Berachot 1, 15 : "Whoever recites a blessing unnecessarily takes the name of God in vain and is like one who swears in vain." The Aramaic source text: "ומשום דמברך ברכה שאינה צריכה וקעבר משום בל תשא ליכא דההיא דרשה דרבנן" (Tosafot on Rosh Hashanah 33a )
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1275002489.
The opening as it stood in 2015
In Talmudical hermeneutics , asmachta is a hint found in the Hebrew Bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given Jewish law . It's an exception in the talmudical hermeneutics, since it doesn't base the law on the cited verse, but uses the verse as a hint. Sometime it isn't clear whether a verse quoted as asmachta or as source, which may cause a controversy over the de'oraita or derabanan quality of the law. An example for such case is the controversy over the source of beracha levatala - the prohibition to say a prayer outside its context.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 662033609.
The opening as it stood in 2020
In Talmudical hermeneutics , asmachta is an allusion found in the Hebrew Bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other Halakha . It's an exception in the talmudical hermeneutics, since it doesn't base the law on the cited verse, but uses the verse as a hint. Sometimes it isn't clear whether the verse has been quoted as an asmachta or as a source, which can lead to controversy over the de'oraita or derabanan quality of the law.An example of such a case is the controversy over berakhah she'eina tzricha or berakhah levatala , the prohibition to say a prayer outside its context.The Talmud says "Anyone who recites an unnecessary blessing violates the biblical prohibition: Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain ".While Maimonides sees it as a source, the Tosafists see it as an asmachta .Berachot 33a Mishneh Torah , Berachot 1, 15 : "Whoever recites a blessing unnecessarily takes the name of God in vain and is like one who swears in vain." The Aramaic source text: "ומשום דמברך ברכה שאינה צריכה וקעבר משום בל תשא ליכא דההיא דרשה דרבנן" (Tosafot on Rosh Hashanah 33a )
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 940123618.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “hint found in the hebrew bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given jewish law”. Today it says “allusion found in the hebrew bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other halakha”. The one-line description Wikipedia serves to search engines and AI systems read “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible”. It now reads “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible In Talmudical hermeneutics”. Read the current article and compare.
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2015, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.
Then
hint found in the hebrew bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given jewish law
Now
allusion found in the hebrew bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other halakha
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.