Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Asmachta (Talmudical hermeneutics)

Wikipedia's first sentence called it “hint found in the hebrew bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given jewish law”. Today it says “allusion found in the hebrew bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other halakha”. The one-line description Wikipedia serves to search engines and AI systems read “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible”. It now reads “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible In Talmudical hermeneutics”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2025 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2025

Asmachta . In Talmudical hermeneutics , asmachta is an allusion found in the Hebrew Bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other Halakha . It's an exception in the talmudical hermeneutics, since it doesn't base the law on the cited verse, but uses the verse as a hint. Sometimes it isn't clear whether the verse has been quoted as an asmachta or as a source, which can lead to controversy over the de'oraita or derabanan quality of the law. An example of such a case is the controversy over berakhah she'eina tzricha or berakhah levatala , the prohibition to say a prayer outside its context. The Talmud says "Anyone who recites an unnecessary blessing violates the biblical prohibition: Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain ". While Maimonides sees it as a source, the Tosafists see it as an asmachta . Berachot 33a Mishneh Torah , Berachot 1, 15 : "Whoever recites a blessing unnecessarily takes the name of God in vain and is like one who swears in vain." The Aramaic source text: "ומשום דמברך ברכה שאינה צריכה וקעבר משום בל תשא ליכא דההיא דרשה דרבנן" (Tosafot on Rosh Hashanah 33a )

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1275002489.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “hint found in the hebrew bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given jewish law”. Today it says “allusion found in the hebrew bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other halakha”. The one-line description Wikipedia serves to search engines and AI systems read “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible”. It now reads “Allusion found in Hebrew Bible In Talmudical hermeneutics”. Read the current article and compare.
20152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2015, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

hint found in the hebrew bible for rabbinic prohibitions or given jewish law

Now

allusion found in the hebrew bible for rabbinical prohibitions or any other halakha

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report