Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Council of Jerusalem

The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none, and neither does the rest of the article, references included.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

Council of Jerusalem" is a name applied in retrospect to a meeting described in Acts of the Apostles chapter 15. The events described there are generally dated about the year 50, some time before the death of James the Just in 62. The council was convened as the result of the disagreement within the early Christian community between those, such as the followers of James, who believed the church must observe the rules of traditional Judaism , and Paul of Tarsus , who believed there was no such necessity. The symbolic central issue became that of circumcision , as the author of Acts relates the initial confrontation in Antioch, where Paul had been preaching: "And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses , ye cannot be saved." Paul and his disciple, here called Barnabas , disputed fiercely with the Jerusalem Christians , so that it was determined that they "and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question." ( Acts 15:2). The Western version of Acts says those from Jerusalem ordered Paul and Barnabas and some others to Jerusalem to be judged before the apostles and elders. The author of Acts identifies the position of the Jerusalem Christians as if they were " Pharisees which believed" in Christ, a label of opprobrium for radicals like the early Christians, but one that was not strictly accurate in this case: "But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command [them] to keep the law of Moses ." ( Acts 15:5). The brackets around "them" shows that it is an addition, an alternate translation of the Greek construct "paraggellein te terein" is found in Andy Gaus' Unvarnished New Testament : "They have to be circumcised; we have to proclaim and keep the law of Moses." At the council, following advice said to have been offered by Simon Peter , whose presence has not otherwise been signalled ( Acts 15:7-11), James, the leader of the Jerusalem Church, gave his decision: "Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: "But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and [from] fornication, and [from] things strangled, and [from] blood. ( Acts 15:19-21) The word "fornication" is a common translation of the Greek word porneia , but there is debate as to what it exactly refers. The word can mean all sexual immorality, from fornication to adultery; as such, different Bibles translate that word in various ways. The Western version of Acts substitutes the negative form of the Golden Rule for the prohibition against things strangled. The Didache , short for "Teaching of the Lord to the Gentiles by the Twelve Apostles", part of the Ethiopian Orthodox Bible and the Apostolic Fathers collection, is generally dated about the same time as Acts. Though it doesn't mention a council, its title strongly suggests it is meant to represent the decree of that council. It starts with a first commandment, the negative form of the Golden Rule, then a second commandment has prohibitions against murder, adultery, corrupting boys, sexual promiscuity, theft, magic, sorcery, abortion, infanticide, coveting, perjury, false testimony, speaking evil, holding grudges, being double-minded, not acting as you speak, greed, avarice, hypocrisy, maliciousness, arrogance, ploting evil against neighbors, hate, narcissism and expansions on these generally with references to the words of Jesus. Chapter 6 says if you can bear the whole yoke of the Lord you will be perfect, but otherwise do what you can, (which seems to parallel James as recorded in Acts), followed by the prohibition against meat sacrificed to idols. Related to the Didache are the Epistle of Barnabas , Didascalia , and Apostolic Constitutions .1

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17982611.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
disputed100000
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

Sections that no longer exist

Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.

  • Interpreting the Council's decision 1,042 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report