Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Historiography of early Islam

The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none, and neither does the rest of the article, references included.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

The historiography of early Islam is the study of how various historians have treated the events of the first two centuries of Islamic history. These events are problematic in that they are disputed by various Islamic sects and because there are so few surviving primary sources for the period. There are few surviving manuscripts and inscriptions, and only sketchy archaeological data. Islamic history seems to have been primarily transmitted orally until well after the rise of the Abbasid caliphate. Islamic scholars then sifted and recorded the traditions. Modern Western scholars are much less likely than Islamic scholars to trust the work of the Abbasid historians. Western historians approach the classic Islamic histories with varying degrees of circumspection. Islamic history after this early period is on a much firmer basis. Not only is there a fair bit of Islamic material surviving -- some of it primary source -- but interested outsiders also made their own records, which can be cross-checked with the Islamic sources.1

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17598917.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
disputed100000
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2005 and 2025.

Then

study of how various historians have treated the events of the first two centuries of islamic history

Now

secular scholarly literature on the early history of islam during the 7th century

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report