In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “proposed name of a binational state solution to the israeli-palestinian conflict by libya 's de facto head of s”. Today it says “proposed unitary”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005
Isratin (also written Israteen) is the proposed name of a binational state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by Libya 's de facto Head of State , Moammar al-Qadhafi . Qadhafi claims that no two state solution will provide the necessary security between the Palestinians and Israelis and that a democratic state , equally respective of the rights of all of its citizens is advisable. The word Isratin is a combination of the Arabic words for Israel and Palestine. This proposal has not gained significant support and is largely thought to be unfeasible by the countries in charge of creating the Middle East Road map for peace . v t e v t e1
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17148896.
The opening as it stood in 2010 4 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Isratin ( , Yisrātīn ; , Isrātīn ) (also known as the bi-national state , medina du-le'umit ), is a term descriptive of a unitary, federal or confederate Israeli-Palestinian state entity encompassing the present territory of Israel , the West Bank and the Gaza Strip .Depending on various points of view, such a scenario is presented as a nightmare situation in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution or, alternatively, as a desirable one-state solution to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict .Increasingly, such scenario is being discussed not as an intentional political solution - desired or undesired - but as the probable, inevitable outcome of the continuous growth of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the apparently irrevocable entrenchment of the Israeli occupation there since 1967.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 366230271.
The opening as it stood in 2015 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Depending on various points of view, such a scenario is presented as a calamity in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution or, alternatively, as a desirable one-state solution to resolving the Israeli–Palestinian conflict . Increasingly, such scenario is being discussed not as an intentional political solution – desired or undesired – but as the probable, inevitable outcome of the continuous growth of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the apparently irrevocable entrenchment of the Israeli occupation there since 1967.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 655918263.
The opening as it stood in 2020
Depending on various points of view, such a scenario is presented as a desirable one-state solution to resolving the Israeli–Palestinian conflict , or as a calamity in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution . Increasingly, Isratin is being discussed not as an intentional political solution – desired or undesired – but as the probable, inevitable outcome of the continuous growth of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the seemingly irrevocable entrenchment of the Israeli occupation there since 1967.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 953300430.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023
Proposed solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict Primary concerns Final borders Israeli settlements Palestinian enclaves Jewish state Palestinian political violence Palestinian refugees Security concerns Status of Jerusalem Zionist political violence Secondary concerns Israeli West Bank barrier Places of worship Fatah–Hamas conflict Water Electricity International brokers The "Quartet" ( United Nations United States European Union Russia ) Arab League Egypt Jordan United Kingdom France Proposals One-state solution : Isratin Elon Peace Plan Two-state solution : Fahd Plan Allon Plan Arab Peace Initiative Geneva Initiative Lieberman Plan Israeli Peace Initiative Palestinian Prisoners' Document Trump Peace Plan Three-state solution Israeli unilateral plans: Hafrada Disengagement Realignment Others Palestinian Emirates Plan Projects / groups / NGOs Peace-orientated projects Israeli–Palestinian economic peace efforts Valley of Peace Middle East economic integration Alliance for Middle East Peace Peres Center for Peace v t e Isratin or Isratine ( , Yisrātīn ; , ʾIsrāṭīn ), also known as the bi-national state ( , medina du-le'umit ), is a proposed unitary , federal or confederate Israeli-Palestinian state encompassing the present territory of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip . Depending on various points of view, such a scenario is presented as a desirable one-state solution to resolving the Israeli–Palestinian conflict , or as a calamity in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution . Increasingly, Isratin is being discussed not as an intentional political solution – desired or undesired – but as the probable, inevitable outcome of the continuous growth of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the seemingly irrevocable entrenchment of the Israeli occupation there since 1967.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1178565611.
The opening as it stood in 2025 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Depending on various points of view, such a scenario is presented as a desirable one-state solution resolving the Israeli–Palestinian conflict , or as a calamity in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution . Increasingly, Isratin is being discussed not as an intentional political solution – desired or undesired – but as the probable, inevitable outcome of the continuous growth of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the seemingly irrevocable entrenchment of the Israeli occupation there since 1967.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1289559428. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “proposed name of a binational state solution to the israeli-palestinian conflict by libya 's de facto head of s”. Today it says “proposed unitary”. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2005, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.
Then
proposed name of a binational state solution to the israeli-palestinian conflict by libya 's de facto head of s
Now
proposed unitary
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.