The word “occupation” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2010. Today the opening carries none. 2 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “occupation” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010
Jud Süß ( Jew Süss ) is a 1940 film produced by Terra Filmkunst on behalf of the Nazi regime and conceived as an antisemitic propaganda film.1The movie was directed by Veit Harlan , who wrote the screenplay with Wolfgang Eberhard Möller and Ludwig Metzger.2It is partially based on the 1925 historical novel Jud Süß by Lion Feuchtwanger as well as the 1827 novella by Wilhelm Hauff . Neither the film, nor the novel, nor the novella correspond to the historic sources regarding Joseph Süß Oppenheimer as still accessible at the Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg. The movie played on basic Nazi stereotypes of Jews having hooked noses and being materialistic, immoral, cunning, untrustworthy and physically unattractive. With the exception of Marian—who shaved off his beard, cut his hair and wore "Christian" attire for most of the story—the actors playing male Jewish characters were made up to look unappealing and alien (non-German) to German audiences. The best example of this is Marian's co-star Werner Krauss who played the two other major Jewish characters, Rabbi Loew and his secretary Levy. There was also a scene that purported to show Jewish religious services. Jewish extras were "recruited" (coerced into performing) in Prague (the capital of the German occupied Bohemia-Moravia ) and the scenes showing the entry of the Jews into Württemberg and worshipping in a synagogue were filmed there.3
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 369780461.
The opening as it stood in 2015 8 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
[ Jud Süß ] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup ( help ) ( , "Süss the Jew") is a 1940 Nazi propaganda film produced by Terra Filmkunst at the behest of Joseph Goebbels , and considered one of the most antisemitic films of all time.The movie was directed by Veit Harlan , who wrote the screenplay with Eberhard Wolfgang Möller and Ludwig Metzger.The leading roles were played by Ferdinand Marian and Harlan's wife Kristina Söderbaum ; Werner Krauss and Heinrich George played key supporting roles.The film has been characterized as "one of the most notorious and successful pieces of antisemitic film propaganda produced in Nazi Germany." It was a great success in Germany, with some 20 million viewers.Although the film's budget of 2 million Reichsmarks was considered high for films of that era, the box office receipts of 6.5 million Reichsmarks made it a financial success.Heinrich Himmler urged members of the SS and police to watch the movie.After the war, some of the leading cast members were brought to trial as part of the denazification process.They generally defended their participation in the film on the grounds that they had only done so under duress.Despite significant evidence to support their arguments, Susan Tegel, author of Nazis and the Cinema , characterizes their postwar attempts to distance themselves from the film as "crass and self-serving".However, she concedes that their motives for accepting the roles seem to have been more driven by opportunistic ambition than by antisemitism.Veit Harlan was the only major movie director of the Third Reich to stand trial for "crimes against humanity".After three trials, Harlan was given a light sentence because he convinced the courts that the antisemitic content of the film had been dictated by Goebbels and that Harlan had worked to moderate the antisemitism.Eventually, Harlan was reinstated as a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany and went on to make nine more films.He remained a controversial figure and the target of protests.Together with Die Rothschilds and Der ewige Jude , both released in 1940, the film remains one of the most frequently discussed examples of the use of film to further the Nazi antisemitic agenda.In 2010, two documentary films were released that explore the history and impact of this movie.The concise Cinegraph: encyclopaedia of German cinema .Propaganda and mass persuasion: a historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present .The postwar conflicting testimony of some of the principals, in which all claim to be friends of the Jews, is crass and self-serving.But amidst the self-serving evasions is enough documented fact to suggest how much opportunism rather than ideology explains the gestation of the most successful antisemitic feature film ever made—in the period before the appointment of Veit Harlan as director.Filming women in the Third Reich .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 668093978.
The opening as it stood in 2020
1940 film For other uses, see Jud Süß (disambiguation) .Jud Süß ( , "Süss the Jew") is a 1940 Nazi German historical drama propaganda film produced by Terra Film at the behest of Joseph Goebbels , and considered one of the most antisemitic films of all time. The film was directed by Veit Harlan , who wrote the screenplay with Eberhard Wolfgang Möller and Ludwig Metzger. The leading roles were played by Ferdinand Marian and Harlan's wife Kristina Söderbaum ; Werner Krauss and Heinrich George played key supporting roles. The film has been characterized as "one of the most notorious and successful pieces of antisemitic film propaganda produced in Nazi Germany." It was a great success in Germany, and was seen by 20 million people. Although its budget of 2 million Reichsmarks was considered high for films of that era, the box office receipts of 6.5 million Reichsmarks made it a financial success. Heinrich Himmler urged members of the SS and police to see it. After the war, some of the leading cast members were brought to trial as part of the denazification process. They generally defended their participation in the film on the grounds that they had only done so under duress. Despite significant evidence to support their arguments, Susan Tegel, author of Nazis and the Cinema , characterizes their postwar attempts to distance themselves from the film as "crass and self-serving"; she concedes that their motives for accepting the roles seem to have been more driven by opportunistic ambition than by antisemitism. Harlan was the only major movie director of the Third Reich to stand trial for "crimes against humanity". After three trials, he was given a light sentence because he convinced the courts that the antisemitic content of the film had been dictated by Goebbels and that Harlan had worked to moderate the antisemitism. Eventually, Harlan was reinstated as a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany and made nine more films. He remained a controversial figure and the target of protests. Together with Die Rothschilds and Der ewige Jude , both released in 1940, the film remains one of the most frequently discussed examples of the use of film to further the Nazi antisemitic agenda. In the 2000s, two documentary films and a drama were released that explore the history and impact of this movie." "Jud Süß" (Süss the Jew)" . The concise Cinegraph: encyclopaedia of German cinema . Propaganda and mass persuasion: a historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present . The postwar conflicting testimony of some of the principals, in which all claim to be friends of the Jews, is crass and self-serving. But amidst the self-serving evasions is enough documented fact to suggest how much opportunism rather than ideology explains the gestation of the most successful antisemitic feature film ever made—in the period before the appointment of Veit Harlan as director. Filming women in the Third Reich .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 960057882.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023
1940 Nazi German film For other uses, see Jud Süß (disambiguation) . Jud Süß ( , "Süss, the Jew") is a 1940 Nazi German historical drama and propaganda film produced by Terra Film at the behest of Joseph Goebbels . It is considered one of the most antisemitic films of all time. The film was directed by Veit Harlan , who wrote the screenplay with Eberhard Wolfgang Möller and Ludwig Metzger. The leading roles were played by Ferdinand Marian and Harlan's wife Kristina Söderbaum ; Werner Krauss and Heinrich George played key supporting roles. The film has been characterized as "one of the most notorious and successful pieces of antisemitic film propaganda produced in Nazi Germany." It was a great success in Germany, and was seen by 20 million people. Although its budget of 2 million Reichsmarks was considered high for films of that era, the box office receipts of 6.5 million Reichsmarks made it a financial success. Heinrich Himmler urged members of the SS and police to see it. After the war, some of the leading cast members were brought to trial as part of the denazification process. They generally defended their participation in the film on the grounds that they had only done so under duress. Despite significant evidence to support their arguments, Susan Tegel, author of Nazis and the Cinema , characterizes their postwar attempts to distance themselves from the film as "crass and self-serving"; she argues that their motives for accepting the roles seem to have been more driven by opportunistic ambition than by antisemitism. Harlan was the only major movie director of the Third Reich to stand trial for crimes against humanity . After three trials, he was given a light sentence because he convinced the courts that the antisemitic content of the film had been dictated by Goebbels and that Harlan had worked to moderate the antisemitism. Eventually, Harlan was reinstated as a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany and made nine more films. He remained a controversial figure and the target of protests. Together with Die Rothschilds and Der ewige Jude , both released in 1940, the film remains one of the most frequently discussed examples of the use of film to further the Nazi antisemitic agenda. In the 2000s, two documentary films and a drama were released that explore the history and impact of the film. " "Jud Süß" (Süss the Jew)" . The concise Cinegraph: encyclopaedia of German cinema . Propaganda and mass persuasion: a historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present . The postwar conflicting testimony of some of the principals, in which all claim to be friends of the Jews, is crass and self-serving. But amidst the self-serving evasions is enough documented fact to suggest how much opportunism rather than ideology explains the gestation of the most successful antisemitic feature film ever made—in the period before the appointment of Veit Harlan as director. Filming women in the Third Reich .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1166029160.
The opening as it stood in 2025 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
1940 Nazi German film For other uses, see Jud Süß (disambiguation) . Goebbels series Jud Süß ( pronounced [juːt zyːs] , ' Süss, the Jew ' ) is a 1940 Nazi German historical drama / propaganda film produced by Terra Film at the behest of Joseph Goebbels . Considered one of the most antisemitic films of all time, the film was directed by Veit Harlan , who co-wrote the screenplay with Eberhard Wolfgang Möller and Ludwig Metzger. It stars Ferdinand Marian and Kristina Söderbaum with Werner Krauss and Heinrich George in key supporting roles. The film has been characterized as "one of the most notorious and successful pieces of antisemitic film propaganda produced in Nazi Germany." It was a great success in Germany, and was seen by 20 million people. Although its budget of 2 million Reichsmarks was considered high for films of that era, the box office receipts of 6.5 million Reichsmarks made it a financial success. Heinrich Himmler urged members of the SS and police to see it. After the war, some of the leading cast members were brought to trial as part of the denazification process. They generally defended their participation in the film on the grounds that they had only done so under duress. Susan Tegel, author of Nazis and the Cinema , characterizes their postwar attempts to distance themselves from the film as "crass and self-serving"; she argues that their motives for accepting the roles seem to have been more driven by opportunistic ambition than by antisemitism. Harlan was the only major movie director of the Third Reich to stand trial for crimes against humanity . After three trials, he was given a light sentence because he convinced the courts that the antisemitic content of the film had been dictated by Goebbels and that Harlan had worked to moderate the antisemitism. Eventually, Harlan was reinstated as a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany and made nine more films. He remained a controversial figure and the target of protests. Together with Die Rothschilds and Der ewige Jude , both released in 1940, the film remains one of the most frequently discussed examples of the use of film to further the Nazi antisemitic agenda. In the 2000s, two documentary films and a drama were released that explore the history and impact of the film. " "Jud Süß" (Süss the Jew)" . The concise Cinegraph: encyclopaedia of German cinema . Propaganda and mass persuasion: a historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present . The postwar conflicting testimony of some of the principals, in which all claim to be friends of the Jews, is crass and self-serving. But amidst the self-serving evasions is enough documented fact to suggest how much opportunism rather than ideology explains the gestation of the most successful antisemitic feature film ever made—in the period before the appointment of Veit Harlan as director. Filming women in the Third Reich .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1296333446. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“occupation” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2. Read the current article and compare.
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
antisemitism
1
6
6
6
6
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2010 and 2025.
Then
a 1940 film produced by terra filmkunst on behalf of the nazi regime and conceived as an antisemitic propaganda
Now
a 1940 nazi german historical drama / propaganda film produced by terra film at the behest of joseph goebbels
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
Editing2,110 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.