Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Military occupation

In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territo”. Today it says “temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is out”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2025 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2025

Effective provisional control of one sovereign power over another sovereign's territory This article is about territorial occupation. American tanks at the Victory Arch in the city of Baghdad during the occupation of Iraq , 2003 Indian troops of the 5th Royal Gurkha Rifles in the city of Kure during the Allied occupation of Japan , 1946 Military occupation , also called belligerent occupation or simply occupation , is temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is outside of the legal boundaries of that ruling power's own sovereign territory. The controlled territory is called occupied territory, and the ruling power is called the occupant . Occupation's intended temporary nature distinguishes it from annexation and colonialism . The occupant often establishes military rule to facilitate administration of the occupied territory, though this is not a necessary characteristic of occupation. The rules of occupation are delineated in various international agreements—primarily the Hague Convention of 1907 , the Geneva Conventions , and also by long-established state practice. The relevant international conventions, the International Committee of the Red Cross , and various treaties by military scholars provide guidelines on topics concerning the rights and duties of the occupying power, the protection of civilians, the treatment of prisoners of war , the coordination of relief efforts, the issuance of travel documents , the property rights of the populace, the handling of cultural and art objects, the management of refugees, and other concerns that are highest in importance both before and after the cessation of hostilities during an armed conflict. A country that engages in a military occupation and violates internationally agreed-upon norms runs the risk of censure, criticism, or condemnation. In the contemporary era, the laws of occupation have largely become a part of customary international law , and form a part of the law of war . Since World War II and the establishment of the United Nations , it has been common practice in international law for occupied territory to continue to be widely recognized as occupied in cases where the occupant attempts to alter—with or without support or recognition from other powers—the expected temporary duration of the territory's established power structure, namely by making it permanent through annexation (formal or otherwise) and refusing to recognize itself as an occupant. Additionally, the question of whether a territory is occupied or not becomes especially controversial if two or more powers disagree with each other on that territory's status; such disputes often serve as the basis for armed conflicts in and of themselves. Springer series in transitional justice. Today, the widely accepted definition of occupation is 'the effective control of a power (be it one or more states or an international organization, such as the United Nations) over a territory to which that power has no sovereign title, without the volition of the sovereign of that territory' Roberts, Adam (1990). American Journal of International Law . 84 (1). The international law of occupation. The intended temporary duration of occupation distinguishes it from both annexation and colonialism. The Politics of Military Occupation . The significance of the temporary nature of military occupation is that it brings about no change of allegiance. Military government remains an alien government whether of short or long duration, though prolonged occupation may encourage the occupying power to change military occupation into something else, namely annexation Roberts, Adam (1985).

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1295734778.
Today
In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territo”. Today it says “temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is out”. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since October 7, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territo

Now

temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is out

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report