In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territo”. Today it says “temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is out”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2025 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2025
Effective provisional control of one sovereign power over another sovereign's territory This article is about territorial occupation. American tanks at the Victory Arch in the city of Baghdad during the occupation of Iraq , 2003 Indian troops of the 5th Royal Gurkha Rifles in the city of Kure during the Allied occupation of Japan , 1946 Military occupation , also called belligerent occupation or simply occupation , is temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is outside of the legal boundaries of that ruling power's own sovereign territory. The controlled territory is called occupied territory, and the ruling power is called the occupant . Occupation's intended temporary nature distinguishes it from annexation and colonialism . The occupant often establishes military rule to facilitate administration of the occupied territory, though this is not a necessary characteristic of occupation. The rules of occupation are delineated in various international agreements—primarily the Hague Convention of 1907 , the Geneva Conventions , and also by long-established state practice. The relevant international conventions, the International Committee of the Red Cross , and various treaties by military scholars provide guidelines on topics concerning the rights and duties of the occupying power, the protection of civilians, the treatment of prisoners of war , the coordination of relief efforts, the issuance of travel documents , the property rights of the populace, the handling of cultural and art objects, the management of refugees, and other concerns that are highest in importance both before and after the cessation of hostilities during an armed conflict. A country that engages in a military occupation and violates internationally agreed-upon norms runs the risk of censure, criticism, or condemnation. In the contemporary era, the laws of occupation have largely become a part of customary international law , and form a part of the law of war . Since World War II and the establishment of the United Nations , it has been common practice in international law for occupied territory to continue to be widely recognized as occupied in cases where the occupant attempts to alter—with or without support or recognition from other powers—the expected temporary duration of the territory's established power structure, namely by making it permanent through annexation (formal or otherwise) and refusing to recognize itself as an occupant. Additionally, the question of whether a territory is occupied or not becomes especially controversial if two or more powers disagree with each other on that territory's status; such disputes often serve as the basis for armed conflicts in and of themselves. Springer series in transitional justice. Today, the widely accepted definition of occupation is 'the effective control of a power (be it one or more states or an international organization, such as the United Nations) over a territory to which that power has no sovereign title, without the volition of the sovereign of that territory' Roberts, Adam (1990). American Journal of International Law . 84 (1). The international law of occupation. The intended temporary duration of occupation distinguishes it from both annexation and colonialism. The Politics of Military Occupation . The significance of the temporary nature of military occupation is that it brings about no change of allegiance. Military government remains an alien government whether of short or long duration, though prolonged occupation may encourage the occupying power to change military occupation into something else, namely annexation Roberts, Adam (1985).
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1295734778.
The opening as it stood in 2005
Belligerent military occupation , occurs when one nation 's military garrisons occupy all or part of the territory of another nation or recognized belligerent during an invasion (during or after a war ).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 16619806.
The opening as it stood in 2010 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Belligerent military occupation occurs when the control and authority over a territory passes to a hostile army .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 366993524.
The opening as it stood in 2015 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Military occupation is effective provisional control of a certain ruling power over a territory which is not under the formal sovereignty of that entity, without the volition of the actual sovereign.Military occupation is distinguished from annexation by its intended temporary nature (i.e. no claim for permanent sovereignty), by its military nature, and by citizenship rights of the controlling power not being conferred upon the subjugated population.Military government may be broadly characterized as the administration or supervision of occupied territory, or as the governmental form of such an administration.Military government is distinguished from martial law , which is the temporary rule by domestic armed forces over disturbed areas.The rules of military government are delineated in various international agreements, primarily the Hague Convention of 1907 , the Geneva Conventions of 1949, as well as established state practice.The relevant international conventions, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Commentaries, and other treaties by military scholars provide guidelines on such topics as rights and duties of the occupying power, protection of civilians , treatment of prisoners of war , coordination of relief efforts, issuance of travel documents , property rights of the populace, handling of cultural and art objects, management of refugees , and other concerns which are very important both before and after the cessation of hostilities.A country that establishes a military government and violates internationally agreed upon norms runs the risk of censure , criticism , or condemnation.In the current era, the practices of military government have largely become a part of customary international law , and form a part of the laws of war .Article 42 of the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare specify that "[t]erritory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army." The form of administration by which an occupying power exercises government authority over occupied territory is called "military government." Neither the Hague Conventions nor the Geneva Conventions specifically define or distinguish an act of "invasion." The terminology of "occupation" is used exclusively.The international law of occupation.Socio-psychological implications for an occupying society: The case of Israel.Termination of War and Treaties of Peace .The Politics of Military Occupation .The significance of the temporary nature of military occupation is that it brings about no change of allegiance.Military government remains an alien government whether of short or long duration, though prolonged occupation may encourage the occupying power to change military occupation into something else, namely annexation
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 668147013.
The opening as it stood in 2020 4 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
US tanks under Baghdad's Victory Arch in occupied Iraq Parade of the 5th Royal Gurkha Rifles in Hiroshima Prefecture during the occupation of Japan after World War II .Military or belligerent occupation (hereon after referred to as simply occupation ) is effective provisional control by a certain ruling power over a territory , which is not under the formal sovereignty of that entity, without the violation of the actual sovereign.The territory is then known as the occupied territory and the ruling power the occupant . Occupation is distinguished from annexation by its intended temporary nature (i.e. no claim for permanent sovereignty), by its military nature, and by citizenship rights of the controlling power not being conferred upon the subjugated population. While an occupant may set up a formal military government in the occupied territory to facilitate its administration, it is not a necessary precondition for occupation. The rules of occupation are delineated in various international agreements, primarily the Hague Convention of 1907 , the Geneva Conventions of 1949, as well as established state practice. The relevant international conventions, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Commentaries, and other treaties by military scholars provide guidelines on such topics as rights and duties of the occupying power, protection of civilians , treatment of prisoners of war , coordination of relief efforts, issuance of travel documents , property rights of the populace, handling of cultural and art objects, management of refugees , and other concerns which are very important both before and after the cessation of hostilities. A country that establishes an occupation and violates internationally agreed upon norms runs the risk of censure , criticism , or condemnation. In the current era, the practices of occupations have largely become a part of customary international law , and form a part of the laws of war . The international law of occupation. Socio-psychological implications for an occupying society: The case of Israel. The Politics of Military Occupation . The significance of the temporary nature of military occupation is that it brings about no change of allegiance. Military government remains an alien government whether of short or long duration, though prolonged occupation may encourage the occupying power to change military occupation into something else, namely annexation Roberts, Adam (1985).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 958237643.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 3 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Effective provisional control of a certain power over a territory This article is about territorial occupation.Soviet troops in Riga , Latvia , during the Soviet occupation of the Baltic states in 1940 during World War II . Parade of the 5th Royal Gurkha Rifles in Hiroshima Prefecture during the occupation of Japan after World War II. Military occupation , also known as belligerent occupation or simply occupation , is the effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territory . The territory is then known as the occupied territory and the ruling power the occupant . Occupation is distinguished from annexation and colonialism by its intended temporary duration. While an occupant may set up a formal military government in the occupied territory to facilitate its administration, it is not a necessary precondition for occupation. The rules of occupation are delineated in various international agreements, primarily the Hague Convention of 1907 , the Geneva Conventions of 1949, as well as established state practice. The relevant international conventions, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Commentaries, and other treaties by military scholars provide guidelines on such topics as rights and duties of the occupying power, protection of civilians , treatment of prisoners of war , coordination of relief efforts, issuance of travel documents , property rights of the populace, handling of cultural and art objects, management of refugees , and other concerns which are very important both before and after the cessation of hostilities. A country that establishes an occupation and violates internationally agreed upon norms runs the risk of censure , criticism , or condemnation. In the current era, the practices of occupations have largely become a part of customary international law , and form a part of the laws of war . Springer series in transitional justice.Today, the widely accepted definition of occupation is 'the effective control of a power (be it one or more states or an international organization, such as the United Nations) over a territory to which that power has no sovereign title, without the volition of the sovereign of that territory' Roberts, Adam (1990).American Journal of International Law . 84 (1). The international law of occupation. The Politics of Military Occupation . The significance of the temporary nature of military occupation is that it brings about no change of allegiance. Military government remains an alien government whether of short or long duration, though prolonged occupation may encourage the occupying power to change military occupation into something else, namely annexation Roberts, Adam (1985).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1176836558.
Today
In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territo”. Today it says “temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is out”. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since October 7, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.
Then
effective military control by a ruling power over a territory that is outside of that power's sovereign territo
Now
temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is out
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.