Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

1982 Lebanon War

“Terror” peaked at 11 mentions in this opening in 2020 and has fallen to 4, while “occupation” rose from 1 to 6. The war that began with PLO attacks is now introduced as the “1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon”.
Read line by line and written up by hand.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-01. “terror” appeared 11 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 4.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2020 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2020

1982 Lebanon War , dubbed Operation Peace for Galilee ( Mivtsa Shlom HaGalil or Mivtsa Sheleg ) by the Israeli government, later known in Israel as the Lebanon War or the First Lebanon War ( , Milhemet Levanon Harishona ), and known in Lebanon as "the invasion" ( , Al-ijtiyāḥ ), began on 6 June 1982, when the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) invaded southern Lebanon , after repeated attacks and counter-attacks between the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) operating in southern Lebanon and the IDF that had caused civilian casualties on both sides of the border.1 The military operation was launched after gunmen from Abu Nidal's organization attempted to assassinate Shlomo Argov , Israel's ambassador to the United Kingdom.2 Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin blamed Abu Nidal's enemy, the PLO, for the incident, and used the incident as a casus belli for the invasion. After attacking the PLO – as well as Syrian, leftist, and Muslim Lebanese forces – the Israeli military, in cooperation with their Maronite allies and the self-styled Free Lebanon State , occupied southern Lebanon, eventually surrounding the PLO and elements of the Syrian Army .3 Surrounded in West Beirut and subjected to heavy bombardment, the PLO forces and their allies negotiated passage from Lebanon with the aid of United States Special Envoy Philip Habib and the protection of international peacekeepers.4 The PLO, under the chairmanship of Yasser Arafat , had relocated its headquarters to Tripoli in June 1982.5 By expelling the PLO, removing Syrian influence over Lebanon, and installing a pro-Israeli Christian government led by President Bachir Gemayel , Israel hoped to sign a treaty which Menachem Begin promised would give Israel "forty years of peace".6 Following the assassination of Gemayel in September 1982, Israel's position in Beirut became untenable and the signing of a peace treaty became increasingly unlikely. Outrage following the IDF's role in the Phalangist-perpetrated Sabra and Shatila massacre of Palestinians and Lebanese Shias , as well as Israeli popular disillusionment with the war, led to a gradual withdrawal from Beirut to the areas claimed by the Free Lebanon State in southern Lebanon (later to become the South Lebanon security belt ), which was initiated following the 17 May Agreement and Syria's change of attitude towards the PLO. After Israeli forces withdrew from most of Lebanon, the War of the Camps broke out between Lebanese factions, the remains of the PLO and Syria, in which Syria fought its former Palestinian allies. At the same time, Shi'a militant groups began consolidating and waging a low-intensity guerrilla war over the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, leading to 15 years of low-scale armed conflict . The Lebanese Civil War would continue until 1990, at which point Syria had established complete dominance over Lebanon .7 A series of simultaneous, amphibious operations was remarkably successful. Subsequently, however, the mission was enlarged and the capture of Beirut signalled the transition to a long drawn-out war. It failed to achieve its ultimate purpose. A peace treaty with Lebanon was signed, but not ratified; the Christian government of fragmented Lebanon was too weak to prevail." Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Netanel Lorch (2013). The failure of Operation Peace of Galilee to achieve its objective prevailed upon the new national coalition government, which took office in 1984, to withdraw forthwith from Lebanon. The third goal was to remove Syrian presence from Lebanon. The recognition that this goal was obviously unsuccessful must betempered by an awareness of the Lebanese situation since 1982. Even when the first two aims seemed to have been met, Syrian recalcitrance acted as a stumbling blocks the Syrians would by nomeans agree to a withdrawal from Lebanon in conjunction with the Israelis and therefore were able to effectively scuttle the 17 May, Agreement between Israel and Lebanon before it had any chance of fulfillment; Syria offered a haven for PLO fighters in the Bekaa Valley from which they could stage raids on the IDF in Lebanon and from which many have now moved back into Beirut and Sidon; and despite having taken severe losses during the June fighting, Syria was able to quickly replace those losses with better Soviet equipment accompanied by a number of Soviet advisors.8 Beware of Small States . In time, however, Arafat and his guerrilla leadership decided that they would have to withdraw, leaving no military and very little political or symbolic presence behind. Their enemy's firepower and overall strategic advantage were too great and it was apparently ready to use them to destroy the whole city over the heads of its inhabitants. The rank and file did not like this decision, and there were murmurings of 'treason' from some of Arafat's harsher critics. Had they not already held out, far longer than any Arab country in any former war, against all that the most powerful army in the Middle East – and the fourth most powerful in the world, according to Sharon – could throw against them? (...) But [Palestinians] knew that, if they expected too much, they could easily lose [Lebanense Muslim support] again. 'If this had been Jerusalem', they said, 'we would have stayed to the end. But Beirut is not outs to destroy.9 The New York Times . 15 June 1982 . "Israel invades Lebanon in response to terrorist attacks by PLO guerrillas based there", USA Today (cited in guardian.co.uk, Facts on File, AP).10 The Year in Review .11 In the early 1980s, the terrorists operating out of Lebanon were controlled by Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation Organization (P.L.O.). On three occasions, in 1970, 1972, and 1978, Israel had retaliated by ground operations carried out up to Lebanon's Litani River. ... Meanwhile Israel had conducted preemptive shelling and air strikes to deter PLO terrorist attacks on settlements in Galilee in northern Israel." Israel , Infoplease . "The PLO had long plagued Israelis with terrorist actions." Tucker, Spencer C.; Roberts, Priscilla (2008).12 A Political, Social, and Military . The Arab-Israeli Conflict: A History . Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues . The operation was called Operation Peace for Galilee and was launched in reply to ongoing PLO attacks from its Lebanese bases. Israeli intelligence knew that this late-model weapon had been supplied to Abu Nidal's organization but not yet to other terrorist groups. . . The key point that the intelligence officers wanted to convey to the Cabinet was that Abu Nidal's organization was an exception among the Palestinian terror groups. Once among Yasser Arafat's closest friends, Abu Nidal had over the years turned into the chairman's most vicious enemy . .Abu Nidal referred to Arafat contemptuously as "the Jewess's son" and had made repeated attempts on his life. There are <ref group=lower-roman> tags or templates on this page, but the references will not show without a template or template (see the help page ).

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 965172278.
Today
“terror” appeared 11 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 4. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '2320252026
militant0011100
islamist0000011
jihad0000001
massacre0011122
genocide0100000
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

Where the word went

It left the opening. It did not leave the article. Wikipedia moved it down the page, where a reader arriving from a search result will not reach it.

  • “militant” now appears 14× under Other consequences, 83% of the way down the article

Sections that no longer exist

Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.

  • Battles of the Beirut-Damascus highway 2,742 characters
  • Investigation into violation of international law 2,552 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report