The 2015 opening led with Holocaust inversion: portraying Israelis as Nazis, and how that discourse shields itself from the resistance racism usually meets. Antisemitism appeared 11 times. Today the opening presents whether such comparisons are antisemitic as “a matter of ongoing debate”, with 7 mentions, and adds that scholars call them a “necessary response”.
Read line by line and written up by hand.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “antisemitism” appeared 11 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 7.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2020 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2020
Holocaust inversion is a phrase which is used to describe the portrayal of Israel or Jews , especially Israeli Jews, as Nazis , crypto-Nazis, Nazi sympathizers, Holocaust perpetrators, or Holocaust "copycats." Whether this discourse is antisemitic when it is related to anti-Zionism is disputed. Marcus , the aim of those who employ Holocaust inversion is to "shock, silence, threaten, insulate, and legitimize". Even when it is frequently used, the use of Holocaust inversion is still shocking, which facilitates its repeated use. He asserts that the tying together of Nazi motifs with Jewish conspiracy stereotypes has a chilling effect on Jewish supporters of Israel. Furthermore, he says, by implying guilt, this discourse is threatening, because it implies a required punishment. As this discourse is performed in the context of political criticism of Israel, it insulates those who use it from the resistance which most forms of racism face in post- WWII society. Finally, he states, inversion not only legitimizes anti-Israel activities, it also legitimizes anti-Jewish activities that would otherwise be hard to conduct. According to Bernard-Henri Lévy , this erodes societal safeguards allowing "people to feel once again the desire and, above all, the right to burn all the synagogues they want, to attack boys wearing yarmulkes, to harass large number of rabbis ... in order for anti-Semitism to be reborn on a large scale". Professor David Feldman , director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism argues that Holocaust inversion is often not antisemitic, because it is a commonly used rhetorical device “used in many arguments about many subjects, often light-mindedly, lacking any specifically antisemitic content” such as Israeli politicians who refer to each other as Nazis, and because the inversion (in relation to the 2014 Gaza war ) is not motivated by an anti-Jewish subjectivity but by criticism of Israeli policy. Extrapolating from a 2011 study which found that a substantial minority of respondents agreed with the statement that "Israel is carrying out a war of extermination against the Palestinians", Manfred Gerstenfeld concluded that some 150 million, out of 400 million, EU citizens espouse a view that demonized Israel . According to Gerstenfeld, Holocaust inversion is a mainstream phenomenon in the European Union . In response to the phenomenon of Holocaust inversion, the Working Definition of Antisemitism (adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance , the US state department, and others) includes several ways in which criticism of Israel may be antisemitic. In particular, the working definition includes the act of "drawing comparison of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis". Holocaust inversion may also be seen as a form of Holocaust revisionism , because it minimizes Nazi crimes. According to Bernard Lewis , the belief that the Nazis were no worse than Israel is has: "brought welcome relief to many who had long borne a burden of guilt for the role which they, their families, their nations, or their churches had played in Hitler's crimes against the Jews, whether by participation or complicity, acquiescence or indifference". In Austria, while overt antisemitism has been limited following the Holocaust, functionally equivalent discourse was able to rise under a new guise. In particular, the Freedom Party of Austria has used Holocaust inversion to delegitimize political opponents. The Dynamics of Delegitimization , chapter by Alan Johnson, page 176 Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism: The Dynamics of Delegitimization , chapter by Alan Johnson, page 177 Jewish Identity and Civil Rights in America , Cambridge University Press, Kenneth L. "‘We are the new Jews!’and ‘The Jewish Lobby’–antisemitism and the construction of a national identity by the Austrian Freedom Party." Nations and Nationalism 22.3 (2016): 484–504.1
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 962961644.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 19 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Portrayal of Jews and Zionists as equivalent to Nazis This poster shown within a 2009 demonstration inside the Scottish city of Edinburgh points at Israel as a nation of "facist [ sic ] murderers".Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany have been made since the 1940s , taking place first within the larger context of the aftermath of World War II .Such comparisons are a rhetorical staple of anti-Zionism in relation to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict .Whether comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany are intrinsically antisemitic is disputed.Toynbee , author of the multivolumed A Study of History , associated Zionism with Nazism, and maintained the view when it was challenged by several scholars.Scholarly analysis has taken place in the broader context of the frequent comparisons made in international popular culture comparing widely various entities to the historical Nazis.British academic David Feldman , director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism , commented that comparisons frequently do not become antisemitic because they take place in the context of a commonly deployed rhetorical device "used in many arguments about many subjects, often light-mindedly, lacking any specifically antisemitic content", as vastly different entities get compared to the Nazis.The Anti-Defamation League , an American social activist organization, has argued in a statement that antisemitism takes place through what it sees as measures "purposefully directed at Jews in an effort to associate the victims of Nazi crimes with the Nazi perpetrators ...[which] serves to diminish the significance and uniqueness of the Holocaust." According to political scientist Ian S.Lustick , a professor at the University of Pennsylvania , such comparisons are "a natural if unintended consequence of the immersion of Israeli Jews in Holocaust imagery".A wide variety of political figures and governments have made the comparison historically, an example being the administration of the Soviet Union in the context of the Six-Day War within 1960s era Cold War divisions.Politicians in the 21st century who have done so include the President of Turkey , Recep Tayyip Erdoğan , and British parliamentarian David Ward .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1166191994.
The opening as it stood in 2025 12 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
22 October 2023: Pro-Palestinian demonstrators in Columbus, Ohio , displaying a poster that reads "Isreal [ sic ] are the new Nazis" amidst Gaza war protests in the United States .Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany occur frequently in the political discourse of anti-Zionism and part of the broader criticism of Israel .Given the legacy of the Holocaust , the nature of these comparisons, and particularly whether they constitute antisemitism , is a matter of ongoing debate.Comparisons between Zionism and Nazism have been made by academics, politicians and public figures, both Jewish and not, since before the establishment of Israel.Some scholars suggest these comparisons can be rhetorical tools without any specific antisemitic intent, or that they can be an informed and necessary response to Israeli policies or actions.Others state such comparisons lack historical and moral equivalence, risk inciting Jew-hatred, and may serve as a form of Holocaust inversion , denial or minimization.During the 20th century, a wide variety of political figures and governments, especially those on the left , have invoked comparisons between Israel or Zionism and Nazism.In the 21st century, politicians who have made such comparisons include Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan , Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva , Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez , Colombian President Gustavo Petro , and others.Omer Bartov , As a former IDF soldier and historian of genocide, I was deeply disturbed by my recent visit to Israel The Guardian 23 August 2024 Klein, Amy (19 April 2009).The Times of Israel . 18 February 2024 .Dow Jones Newswires reported that, on August 10, while giving a speech in eastern Venezuela, Chávez said Venezuelans are "making a call to world leaders, for the love of God, let's halt this crazy fascist aggression against innocent people.Are we human or what are we?...I feel indignation for Israel's assault on the Palestinian people and the Lebanese people.They dropped bombs on shelters. ...There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or templates on this page, but the references will not show without a template or template (see the help page ).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1297892061.
The opening as it stood in 2026 2 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany occur frequently in the political discourse of anti-Zionism and part of the broader criticism of Israel . Given the legacy of the Holocaust , the nature of these comparisons, and particularly whether they constitute antisemitism , is a matter of fervent controversy. Comparisons between Zionism and Nazism have been made by academics, politicians and public figures, both Jewish and not, since before the establishment of Israel . Some scholars suggest these comparisons can be rhetorical tools without any specific antisemitic intent, or that they can be an informed and necessary response to Israeli policies or actions. Others state such comparisons lack historical and moral equivalence, risk inciting antisemitism and may serve as a form of Holocaust inversion, denial or minimisation. During the 20th century, a wide variety of political figures and governments, especially those on the left , have invoked comparisons between Israel or Zionism, and Nazism. In the 21st century, politicians who have made such comparisons include Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan , Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva , Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez , Colombian president Gustavo Petro and others. Omer Bartov , As a former IDF soldier and historian of genocide, I was deeply disturbed by my recent visit to Israel The Guardian 23 August 2024 Klein, Amy (19 April 2009). The Times of Israel . 18 February 2024 . Dow Jones Newswires reported that, on August 10, while giving a speech in eastern Venezuela, Chávez said Venezuelans are "making a call to world leaders, for the love of God, let's halt this crazy fascist aggression against innocent people. Are we human or what are we?... I feel indignation for Israel's assault on the Palestinian people and the Lebanese people. They dropped bombs on shelters. ...
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1364213951. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“antisemitism” appeared 11 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 7. Read the current article and compare.
2020
Oct '23
2025
2026
antisemitism
8
6
3
4
disputed
1
1
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
Historical examples4,088 characters
Debate on whether comparisons are antisemitic3,850 characters
21st-century discussions and commentary3,880 characters
Filenames as Wikipedia recorded them at each snapshot. Interface icons are filtered out; these are photographs, maps and documents.
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.
