The word “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2010. Today the opening carries none. 2 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010
2005 began when Newsweek's April 30 issue contained a report asserting that U.S. prison guards or interrogators had deliberately damaged a copy of Islam 's holiest book, the Qur'an .1A week later, Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in The New Yorker , reporting the words of Pakistani politician Imran Khan : “This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Koran.” This incident caused upset in parts of the Muslim world. 'For five days, nothing.2Then, on May 6th, Khan, in a press conference in Islamabad, waved a copy of the offending issue and thundered, “This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Koran.” And, rhetorically addressing Musharraf: “This war on terrorism is self-defeating if, on the one hand, you are demanding that we help them”—that is, us—“and, on the other hand, they are desecrating the book on which our entire faith is based.” Khan’s remarks were broadcast repeatedly throughout the Muslim world.3The riots began on May 10th; in Afghanistan, seventeen people died and more than a hundred were injured.' The Newsweek article, part of which was subsequently retracted, stated that allegations that U.S. personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives had been confirmed by government sources.4 The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Qur'an mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the Qur'an by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union , suing under the Freedom of Information Act , secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Qur'an into a toilet. This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; Newsweek' s initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and riots in Afghanistan , where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed. The Newsweek affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Qur'an desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002.
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 347594095.
The opening as it stood in 2005
The Qur'an desecration controversy of 2005 captured international attention in April 2005 when Newsweek published an article which appeared to confirm several previous allegations that U.S. personnel at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp had damaged a copy of the Qur'an by putting it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives. The report stated that an un-named official had seen a preliminary copy of unreleased U.S. government report confirming the charge. The report sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and perhaps added fuel to pre-planned demonstrations in Afghanistan which turned deadly. Although the magazine subsequently retracted parts of the story, a U.S. military inquiry confirmed at least five cases of Qur'an mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, and the affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 17962128.
The opening as it stood in 2015
The 2005 Quran desecration controversy began when Newsweek 's April 30 issue contained a report asserting that United States prison guards or interrogators had deliberately damaged a copy of Islam's holiest book, the Quran . A week later, Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in The New Yorker , reporting the words of Pakistani politician Imran Khan : "This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Koran." This incident caused upset in parts of the Muslim world. 'For five days, nothing. Then, on May 6th, Khan, in a press conference in Islamabad, waved a copy of the offending issue and thundered, “This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Koran.” And, rhetorically addressing Musharraf: “This war on terrorism is self-defeating if, on the one hand, you are demanding that we help them”—that is, us—“and, on the other hand, they are desecrating the book on which our entire faith is based.” Khan’s remarks were broadcast repeatedly throughout the Muslim world. The riots began on May 10th; in Afghanistan, seventeen people died and more than a hundred were injured.' The Newsweek article, part of which was subsequently retracted, stated that allegations that United States personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives had been confirmed by government sources. The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Quran mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the Quran by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union , suing under the Freedom of Information Act , secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Quran into a toilet. This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; Newsweek' s initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and riots in Afghanistan , where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed. The Newsweek affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Quran desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 606698545.
The opening as it stood in 2020 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
The 2005 Quran desecration controversy began when Newsweek 's April 30, 2005, issue contained a report asserting that United States prison guards or interrogators had deliberately damaged a copy of the Quran . A week later, The New Yorker reported the words of Pakistani politician Imran Khan : "This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Koran." This incident caused upset in parts of the Muslim world. The Newsweek article, parts of which were subsequently retracted, alleged that government sources had confirmed that United States personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives. The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Quran mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the Quran by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union , suing under the Freedom of Information Act , secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Quran into a toilet. This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; Newsweek' s initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and riots in Afghanistan , where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed. The Newsweek affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Quran desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 941938331.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023
2005 Islam-related controversy The 2005 Quran desecration controversy began when Newsweek 's April 30, 2005, issue contained a report asserting that United States prison guards or interrogators had deliberately damaged a copy of the Quran . A week later, The New Yorker reported the words of Pakistani politician Imran Khan : "This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Quran." This incident caused upset in parts of the Muslim world. The Newsweek article, parts of which were subsequently retracted, alleged that government sources had confirmed that United States personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives. The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Quran mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the Quran by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union , suing under the Freedom of Information Act , secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Quran into a toilet. This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; Newsweek' s initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and riots in Afghanistan , where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed. The Newsweek affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Quran desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002. "Guantánamo denounced as a "gulag" " . 26 May 2005.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1177846886.
The opening as it stood in 2025
2005 Islam-related controversy The 2005 Quran desecration controversy began when Newsweek 's April 30, 2005, issue contained a report asserting that United States prison guards or interrogators had deliberately damaged a copy of the Quran . A week later, The New Yorker reported the words of Pakistani politician Imran Khan : "This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Quran." This incident caused violent unrest in some parts of the Muslim world. The Newsweek article, parts of which were subsequently retracted, alleged that government sources had confirmed that United States personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives. The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Quran mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the Quran by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union , suing under the Freedom of Information Act , secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Quran into a toilet. This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; Newsweek 's initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and riots in Afghanistan , where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed. The Newsweek affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Quran desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002. "Guantánamo denounced as a "gulag" " . 26 May 2005.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1281967468. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
terror
0
1
1
0
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
US military findings1,635 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.