The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none. 2 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005
Related topics Art Adherents Criticism Culture Ecumenism Liturgy Mission Other religions Persecution Prayer Sermon Symbolism Western society Worship Sabbath in Christianity Gregorian calendar Glossary Index Outline Christianity portal v t e In Judeo-Christian theology , the word apocrypha ( Greek απόκρυφα, neuter plural of απόκρυφος, "hidden") refers to texts that are not considered canonical , part of the Bible , but are of roughly similar style and age as the accepted Scriptures. Wilson wrote: "The Greek word apocryphos did not always have the disparaging sense which later became attached to it. In Gnostic circles it was used of books the contents of which were too sacred to be divulged to the common herd, and it was in fact the heretical associations which it thus came to possess which led to its use as a term of disparagement. In the Nag Hammadi library, for example, one document bears the title Apocryphon or Secret Book of John, another that of Apocryphon of James, and several Gnostic gospels contain solemn warnings against imparting their contents to any save the deserving, or for the sake of material gain." —from Studies in the Gospel of Thomas (the "apocryphal" Gospel of Thomas ) Apart from the broad sense mentioned in the first paragraph above, Protestants use the word "apocrypha", in a narrow sense, of those books that they exclude from their canon of Scripture, but that other Churches view as canonical and venerate as divinely inspired, written under the influence of the Holy Spirit. Disagreement between Christian Churches is almost non-existent about the canon of the New Testament , but the inclusion of some books in the Old Testament canon is disputed. Since these books were of late composition, Protestant scholars sometimes call them "intertestamental", i.e. intermediate between the Old and New Testaments, and hold that God imposed a period of silence, with no prophecy or Scripture, to prepare for the coming of Jesus . The books that come under the description "apocrypha" in the broad sense but not in this narrow sense are called apocrypha by Catholics and Jews, but Protestants usually call them Pseudepigrapha . Many of them have apocalyptic themes.1
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17807319.
The opening as it stood in 2010 8 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
The term apocrypha is used with various meanings, including "hidden", "esoteric", "spurious", "of questionable authenticity", and "Christian texts that are not canonical ".The word is originally Greek ( ) and means "those having been hidden away".Specifically, is the neuter plural of ἀπόκρυφος, a participle derived from the verb ἀποκρύπτω [infinitive: ἀποκρύπτειν], "to hide something away." The general term is usually applied to the books that the Christian Church considered useful but not divinely inspired .As such, it is misleading to refer to the Gospel according to the Hebrews or Gnostic writings as apocryphal, because they would not be classified in the same category by orthodox believers.Non- canonical books are texts of uncertain authenticity, or writings where the work is seriously questioned.Given that different denominations have different beliefs about what constitutes canonical scripture , there are several versions of the apocrypha.During 16th-century controversies about the biblical canon , the word acquired a negative connotation, and has become a synonym for "spurious" or "false".This usage usually involves fictitious or legendary accounts that are plausible enough to be commonly considered true.There is disagreement about how to depict a modern equivalent term to the ancient word apocrypha .Some would argue that it was like "top secret government files".
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 366210389.
The opening as it stood in 2015 10 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Apocrypha are works, usually written works, that are of unknown authorship, or of doubtful authenticity, or spurious, or not considered to be within a particular canon.The word is properly treated as a plural, but in common usage is often singular.In the context of the Jewish and Christian Bibles, where most texts are of unknown authorship, Apocrypha usually refers to a set of texts included in the Septuagint but not in the Hebrew Bible .The word's origin is the Medieval Latin adjective apocryphus , "secret, or non-canonical", from the Greek adjective ἀπόκρυφος ( apokryphos ), "obscure", from the verb ἀποκρύπτειν ( apokryptein ), "to hide away".
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 663740580.
The opening as it stood in 2020 3 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Works of unknown authorship or of doubtful origin Apocryphal letter of Sultan Mehmed II to the Pope ("Notes et extraits pour servir à l'histoire des croisades au XVe siècle") / published by Nicolas Jorga .Series 4: 1453–1476, Paris; Bucarest, 1915, pages 126–127 Apocrypha are works, usually written, of unknown authorship or of doubtful origin.Biblical apocrypha are a set of texts included in the Septuagint and Latin Vulgate but not in the Hebrew Bible .While Catholic tradition considers some of these texts to be deuterocanonical , Protestants consider them apocryphal.Thus, Protestant bibles do not include the books within the Old Testament but have sometimes included them in a separate section, usually called the Apocrypha.Other non-canonical apocryphal texts are generally called pseudepigrapha , a term that means " false attribution ". The word's origin is the Medieval Latin adjective apocryphus , "secret, or non-canonical", from the Greek adjective ἀπόκρυφος ( apokryphos ), "obscure", from the verb ἀποκρύπτειν ( apokryptein ), "to hide away".
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 964536621.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 3 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Works of unknown authorship or of doubtful origin This article is about the general concept of apocryphal literature. The apocryphal letter of Sultan Mehmed II to the Pope ( Notes et extraits pour servir à l'histoire des croisades au XVe siècle ), published by Nicolas Jorga . Series 4: 1453–1476, Paris; Bucarest, 1915, pages 126–127 Apocrypha is biblical or related writings not forming part of the accepted canon of Scripture.While some might be of doubtful authorship or authenticity, in Christianity , the word apocryphal (ἀπόκρυφος) was first applied to writings which were to be read privately rather than in the public context of church services.Apocrypha were edifying Christian works that were not considered canonical Scripture .It was not until well after the Protestant Reformation that the word apocrypha was used by some ecclesiastics to mean "false," "spurious," "bad," or "heretical." From a Protestant point of view, Biblical apocrypha are a set of texts included in the Septuagint , (the Hebrew Bible in Greek), used for over two-hundred years by Jews and by early Christians.After the fall of Jerusalem, the Jews restored the Hebrew language to their Bible.The books which were included in the Septuagint but not in the original Hebrew Bible were set apart and remained in Greek.Later, when Jerome translated the Canon of Scripture and produced the Latin Vulgate , he labelled those books as Apocrypha.Catholic and Orthodox Churches consider them to be canonical, some Protestants consider them apocryphal, that is, non-canonical books that are useful for instruction.Luther's Bible placed them in a separate section in between the Old Testament and New Testament called the Apocrypha, a convention followed by subsequent Protestant Bibles .Some non-canonical apocryphal texts are called pseudepigrapha , a term that means " false attribution ".The modern English adjective "apocryphal" is often used to indicate that a writing on any topic is of doubtful authenticity; spurious, fictitious, false; fabulous or mythical.(Subscription or participating institution membership required.) Wells, Preston B.The Story of the English Bible .Fourteen books and parts of books are considered Apocryphal by Protestants.Three of these are recognized by Roman Catholics also as Apocryphal .English Bibles were patterned after those of the Continental Reformers by having the Apocrypha set off from the rest of the OT.All English Bibles prior to 1629 contained the Apocrypha.Matthew's Bible (1537), the Great Bible (1539), the Geneva Bible (1560), the Bishop's Bible (1568), and the King James Bible (1611) contained the Apocrypha.Soon after the publication of the KJV, however, the English Bibles began to drop the Apocrypha and eventually they disappeared entirely.The first English Bible to be printed in America (1782–83) lacked the Apocrypha.In 1826 the British and Foreign Bible Society decided to no longer print them.Today the trend is in the opposite direction, and English Bibles with the Apocrypha are becoming more popular again.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1178918813.
The opening as it stood in 2025 7 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Works of unknown authorship or of doubtful origin This article is about the general concept of apocryphal literature. The apocryphal letter of Sultan Mehmed II to the Pope ( Notes et extraits pour servir à l'histoire des croisades au XVe siècle ), published by Nicolae Iorga . Series 4: 1453–1476, Paris; Bucarest, 1915, pages 126–127 Apocrypha ( / ə ˈ p ɒ k r ɪ f ə / ) are biblical or related writings not forming part of the accepted canon of scripture, some of which might be of doubtful authorship or authenticity. In Christianity , the word apocryphal (ἀπόκρυφος) was first applied to writings that were to be read privately rather than in the public context of church services. Apocrypha were edifying Christian works that were not always initially included as canonical scripture .The adjective "apocryphal", meaning of doubtful authenticity, mythical, fictional, is recorded from the late 16th century, then taking on the popular meaning of "false," "spurious," "bad," or "heretical." It may be used for any book which might have scriptural claims but which does not appear in the canon accepted by the author.A related term for non-canonical apocryphal texts whose authorship seems incorrect is pseudepigrapha , a term that means " false attribution ".In Christianity, the name " the Apocrypha " is applied to a particular set of books which, when they appear in a Bible, are sometimes placed between the Old and New Testaments in a section called "Apocrypha." The canonicity of such books took longer to determine.Various of these books are accepted by the Catholic Church , Orthodox Churches and the Church of the East , as deuterocanonical .Some Protestant traditions reject them outright; others regard the Apocrypha as non-canonical books that are useful for instruction.(Subscription or participating institution membership required.) "apocryphal" .(Subscription or participating institution membership required.) Bromley, Geoffrey William, ed.The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (2 ed.). English Bibles were patterned after those of the Continental Reformers by having the Apocrypha set off from the rest of the OT. All English Bibles prior to 1629 contained the Apocrypha. Matthew's Bible (1537), the Great Bible (1539), the Geneva Bible (1560), the Bishop's Bible (1568), and the King James Bible (1611) contained the Apocrypha. Soon after the publication of the KJV, however, the English Bibles began to drop the Apocrypha and eventually they disappeared entirely. The first English Bible to be printed in America (1782–83) lacked the Apocrypha. In 1826 the British and Foreign Bible Society decided to no longer print them. Today the trend is in the opposite direction, and English Bibles with the Apocrypha are becoming more popular again. The Story of the English Bible . Fourteen books and parts of books are considered Apocryphal by Protestants. Three of these are recognized by Roman Catholics also as Apocryphal .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1297633132. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
disputed
1
0
0
0
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.