Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Book of generations

Wikipedia's first sentence called it “hypothesized text that the modern documentary hypothesis claims was used by the redactor of the torah to connec”. Today it says “hypothesized hebrew text which lies behind two passages in the book of genesis”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010

Book of generations is an hypothesized text that the modern documentary hypothesis claims was used by the redactor of the torah to connect up parts of the priestly source and the JE source .1 The text is no longer extant, but in the hypothesis, portions of the text survive as part of the torah .2 In particular, the text is believed to be fragmented across several portions of the text, since it was used as a filler for several joins. It was Frank Moore Cross who first demonstrated that the text was separate to the other sources, which are substantially larger in comparison. The standard reconstructed version of the text, formed by collecting together the various fragments, indicates that its presence is usually announced in the torah by the words "and these are the generations of [insert name of biblical figure here]". The text itself appears to be a basic genealogy of the main ancestors of the Israelites, putting emphasis on the main line that leads from Adam , to Noah , then to Abraham , Jacob , and to Moses . However, there also appear to be a few asides to detail significant lines apart from this, such as that concerning Edom .3

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 299647241.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “hypothesized text that the modern documentary hypothesis claims was used by the redactor of the torah to connec”. Today it says “hypothesized hebrew text which lies behind two passages in the book of genesis”. Read the current article and compare.
201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2010, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

hypothesized text that the modern documentary hypothesis claims was used by the redactor of the torah to connec

Now

hypothesized hebrew text which lies behind two passages in the book of genesis

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report