Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Buried by the Times

The word “refugee” appeared 3 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2010. Today the opening carries none. 8 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “refugee” appeared 3 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 8.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010

Buried by the Times is a book by Laurel Leff, an associate professor of journalism at Northeastern University .1 It is an account of the New York Times ' coverage of Nazi atrocities against Jews that culminated in the Holocaust .2 The book makes the argument that the paper's publisher deliberately chose to "bury" such news in the back pages for ideological reasons. According to the book Arthur Hays Sulzberger , who was publisher of the Times from 1935 to 1961, took the position that Jewishness is solely a matter of belief, that it does not and ought not to have any ethnic or national component, no ethnic peoplehood. He opposed the creation of a Jewish state . His political commitments were to the United States and to universalism . He did not want the Times to be or even appear to be too Jewish. According to Leff, Sulzberger went out of his way to ensure the Times would not portray Jews as the particular victims of Nazism , gave very little print to the news of genocide targeting Jews as it emerged from Europe and did not support the rescue of European Jews . Leff's ongoing work on American responses to the Holocaust continues to draw attention. Her research paper Rebuffing Refugee Journalists: The Profession's Failure to Help Jews Persecuted by Nazi Germany asserting that journalists, unlike physicians and attorneys, failed to establish committees to help Jewish refugees secure positions that would have made them exempt from immigration limits and allowed them to come to the United States, inspired a campaign to get the Newspaper Association of America to acknowledge its predecessor organization in the 1930s "was wrong to turn its back on Jewish refugee journalists fleeing Hitler". The Newspaper Association of America responded by issuing a statement regretting that its predecessor organization did not give a full public airing to the issue at the time and by holding a special session on the topic at its annual meeting.3

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 370151785.
Today
“refugee” appeared 3 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 8. Read the current article and compare.
201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2010 and 2025.

Then

book by laurel leff

Now

a 2005 book by laurel leff

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report