The word “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none. 3 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 3.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005
It is particularly critical of commentators and politicians who attack the War on Terror . After the right-wing writer Ann Coulter 's column was dropped from the conservative National Review Online because of a personal and editing dispute regarding a column she wrote on the September 11, 2001 attacks , FrontPageMag agreed to sponsor her regular column.1
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 16908093.
The opening as it stood in 2015 2 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
In June 2015 it had an Alexa ranking of 8,897.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 666437021.
The opening as it stood in 2020 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
The website has been described by scholars and writers as right-wing, far-right, Islamophobic, and anti-Islam.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 964930922.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023
It has been described by scholars and writers as right-wing , far-right , and Islamophobic .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1174937981.
The opening as it stood in 2025
The site has also been described by scholars and writers as far-right and Islamophobic ."An interfaith marriage of our times: Muslim and Jewish groups form coalition to fight bigotry" .The Muslim Brotherhood Boogeyman" .Islamophobia in America: the anatomy of intolerance .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1288095900. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 3. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
terror
1
0
0
0
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2005 and 2025.
Then
neoconservative online journal edited by david horowitz and published by the center for the study of popular cu
Now
american right-wing
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
History476 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.
