Ghaza thesis

A rough map depicting Anatolia in the year 1300, when the Ottoman state (red) first came into existence. The Ghaza or Ghazi thesis (from , ġazā , "holy war," or simply "raid") is a historical paradigm first formulated by Paul Wittek which has been used to interpret the nature of the Ottoman Empire during the earliest period of its history, the fourteenth century, and its subsequent history. The thesis addresses the question of how the Ottomans were able to expand from a small principality on the frontier of the Byzantine Empire into a centralized, intercontinental empire. According to the Ghaza thesis, the Ottomans accomplished this by attracting recruits to fight for them in the name of Islamic holy war against the non-believers . Such a warrior was known in Turkish as a ghazi , and thus this thesis sees the early Ottoman state as a "Ghazi State," defined by an ideology of holy war. The Ghaza Thesis dominated early Ottoman historiography throughout much of the twentieth century before coming under increasing criticism beginning in the 1980s. Historians now generally reject the Ghaza Thesis, and consequently the idea that Ottoman expansion was primarily fueled by holy war, but disagree about what hypothesis to replace it. The Cambridge History of Turkey . Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State . p. xi–xii. In Kate Fleet (ed.). The Cambridge History of Turkey . Scholars following in Wittek's footsteps have moved away from his strong formulation [...] It is probably safe to suggest that at the moment there is no agreed point of reference about which most scholars gather, and that a more eclectic approach, resting more on the sources than on scholarly tradition, holds the field. There are <ref group=nb> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a template (see the help page ).

Historical narrative Not to be confused with Gaza . A rough map depicting Anatolia in the year 1300, when the Ottoman state (red) first came into existence. The Ghaza or Ghazi thesis (from , ġazā , "holy war," or simply "raid") is a historical paradigm first formulated by Paul Wittek which has been used to interpret the nature of the Ottoman Empire during the earliest period of its history, the fourteenth century, and its subsequent history. The thesis addresses the question of how the Ottomans were able to expand from a small principality on the frontier of the Byzantine Empire into a centralized, intercontinental empire. According to the Ghaza thesis, the Ottomans accomplished this by attracting recruits to fight for them in the name of Islamic holy war against the non-believers . Such a warrior was known in Ottoman Turkish as a ghazi , and thus this thesis sees the early Ottoman state as a "Ghazi State," defined by an ideology of holy war. The Ghaza Thesis dominated early Ottoman historiography throughout much of the twentieth century before coming under increasing criticism beginning in the 1980s. Historians now generally reject the Ghaza Thesis, and consequently the idea that Ottoman expansion was primarily fueled by holy war, but disagree about what hypothesis to replace it with. The Cambridge History of Turkey . Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State . p. xi–xii. In Kate Fleet (ed.). The Cambridge History of Turkey . Scholars following in Wittek's footsteps have moved away from his strong formulation [...] It is probably safe to suggest that at the moment there is no agreed point of reference about which most scholars gather, and that a more eclectic approach, resting more on the sources than on scholarly tradition, holds the field. There are <ref group=nb> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a template (see the help page ).