The word “terror” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2015. Today the opening carries none. 7 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “terror” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 7.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2015 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2015
IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz in a training exercise where the forces practiced a soldier abduction scenario. Addressing the IDF's operations forum, Ganz stated that the directive does not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his abduction.1The Hannibal Directive ( ) (or “Hannibal Procedure” or "Hannibal Protocol" ) is a secret directive of the Israel Defense Forces with the purpose of preventing Israeli soldiers being captured by enemy forces in the course of combat. Israel has with several notable exceptions adhered to the principle of not negotiating with what it considers terrorists and this especially in hostage situations. This policy led to some notable successes, such as Operation Entebbe but also to loss of human life, as in the Maalot Massacre . In cases where Israeli soldiers were captured and no military solution was found, Israel was forced to negotiate with the captors about an exchange of prisoners. On several occasions this led to a highly controversial release of hundreds or even thousands of convicted or suspected terrorists in Israeli captivity. The order, drawn up in 1986 by a group of top Israeli officers, states that at the time of a capture the main mission becomes forcing the release of the captured soldiers from their captors, even if that means injury to Israeli soldiers. It allows commanders to take whatever action is necessary, including endangering the life of a captured soldier, to foil the capture.2However it does not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his capture, according to the IDF chief of staff, Benny Gantz .3After Shalit, some IDF officers see a dead soldier as better than abducted , Haaretz. 2011 Israeli army employed 'Hannibal Protocol' to prevent officer's abduction , i24news , August 4, 2014.4
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 668468749.
The opening as it stood in 2020 7 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) in a training exercise where the forces practiced a soldier abduction scenario.Addressing the IDF's operations forum, Ganz stated that IDF protocols do not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his abduction.The Hannibal Directive ( ) (or “Hannibal Procedure” or "Hannibal Protocol" ) is the code name of an order that the Israel Defense Forces has been accused of implementing regarding how field units should respond when a soldier is captured by enemy forces.According to an article written by Israeli journalist Sara Leibovich-Dar in 2003, the Hannibal Directive was drawn up in 1986 by a group of top Israeli officers and was officially in force until the year 2000.Leibovich-Dar quoted former Major General Yossi Peled as saying that the directive authorized attempting to stop abductors, for example by shooting at them, even if it put captured Israeli soldiers at risk.Peled denied that the aim was to kill the captured soldiers.However, since 2003, other writers have claimed that the policy is still in place, at least unofficially.Furthermore, some claim that the policy actually promotes the killing of captured soldiers to prevent the need for prisoner exchanges . After Shalit, some IDF officers see a dead soldier as better than abducted , Haaretz . 2011 Israeli army employed 'Hannibal Protocol' to prevent officer's abduction , i24news , August 4, 2014.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 935710363.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 6 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Secret Israeli military protocol IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) in a training exercise where the forces practiced a soldier abduction scenario. Addressing the IDF's operations forum, Ganz stated that IDF protocols do not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his abduction. The Hannibal Directive ( ) (or "Procedure" or "Protocol") is a controversial procedure that Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have used follow to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces.It was introduced in 1986, after a number abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and the subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges.The full text of directive has never been published and until 2003 Israeli military censorship even forbade any discussion of the subject in the press.The directive has been changed several times.At one time the formulation was that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces." The Hannibal directive have, at times, apparently existed in two different versions, one top-secret written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and one "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels.In the latter versions, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was "better dead than abducted".In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers.The Hannibal directive has not prevented the capture of a single Israeli soldier.Among the 11 Israelis involved in the seven reported Hannibal incidents, only one soldier ( Gilad Shalit ) survived.In his case the declaration of Hannibal occurred too late to have any influence on the cause of events.There is however only one case where Israeli forces have been officially confirmed to be directly responsible for an Israeli death. After Shalit, some IDF officers see a dead soldier as better than abducted , Haaretz . 2011 Weizman, Eyal (2017).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1166185195.
The opening as it stood in 2025 5 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Controversial Israeli military protocol In 2016, the Hannibal Directive was revoked by then-IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot . Then-IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) in a training exercise where the forces practiced a soldier abduction scenario. Addressing the IDF's operations forum, Gantz stated that IDF protocols do not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his abduction. The Hannibal Directive ( Hebrew : נוהל חניבעל , romanized : Nóhal Khanibaál ), also translated as Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol , is the name of a controversial procedure used by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces.According to one version, it says that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces." It was introduced in 1986, after a number of abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges.The full text of the directive was never published, and until 2003, Israeli military censorship forbade any discussion of the subject in the press.The directive has been changed several times, and in 2016 Gadi Eisenkot ordered the formal revocation of the standing directive and the reformulation of the protocol.Two versions of the Hannibal Directive may have existed simultaneously at times: a written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and an "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter version, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was 'better dead than abducted'". In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers to prevent abduction. In case of the abduction of Gilad Shalit , invocation of the Hannibal Directive occurred too late to have any influence on the course of events.Israeli newspapers including Haaretz , ABC News and the UN's Commission of Inquiry have pointed out that during the October 7 attacks the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used.The IDF was ordered to prevent "at all costs" the abduction of Israeli civilians or soldiers, possibly leading to the death of a large number of Israeli hostages.Forensic Architecture, Violence at the Threshold of Detectability ."Israel accused of killing its own civilians under the 'Hannibal Directive' to avoid them being taken hostage" .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1296896555. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“terror” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 7. Read the current article and compare.
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
terror
2
0
0
0
massacre
1
0
0
0
hostage
1
0
0
1
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
The directive5,451 characters
Controversy within the army3,274 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.