Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

New Historians

The word “displacement” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none. 2 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “displacement” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

New Historians are a loosely-defined group of Israeli historians who have declared as their goal the reexamination of the history of Israel and Zionism .1 They are sometimes referred to as Post-Zionists . Leading scholars in this school include Benny Morris , Ilan Pappé , and Avi Shlaim . They base their research on Israeli government documents that have become public since the late 1980s . Much of their work has been accepted by the Israeli public; other Israeli historians criticise their conclusions and methodology. The New Historians' publications include a variety of views. Generally, though, they present the Zionist movement as aimed in such a way that Jewish statehood could only be possible through the displacement of at least some Palestinian Arabs. (The countervailing, traditional Israeli view is that that displacement was neither necessary for Israel's establishment nor desired by those establishing it.) According to the New Historians, Israel therefore has its own share of responsibility for the Arab-Israeli conflict and the Palestinian plight. In particular, they claim that at least a portion of the Palestinian refugees were driven away from their homes, rather than fleeing of their own choice, as previously claimed. The writings of the New Historians have come under repeated criticism, both from historians who support a more traditional Zionist historiography and from Arab or pro-Arab writers who accuse them of whitewashing the truth about Zionist misbehavior. Early in 2002, the most famous of the new historians, Benny Morris, publicly reversed some of his personal political positions [ Morris, 2002 ], though he has not withdrawn any of his historical writings. Anita Shapira offers the following criticism: One of the more serious charges raised against the "new historians" concerned their sparse use of Arab sources. In a preemptive move, [Avi] Shlaim states at the outset of his new book that his focus is on Israeli politics and the Israeli role in relations with the Arab world--and thus he has no need of Arab documents. [Benny] Morris claims that he is able to extrapolate the Arab positions from the Israeli documentation. Both authors make only meager use of original Arab sources, and most such references cited are in English translation...To write the history of relations between Israel and the Arab world almost exclusively on the basis of Israeli documentation results in obvious distortions. Every Israeli contingency plan, every flicker of a far-fetched idea expressed by David Ben-Gurion and other Israeli planners, finds its way into history as conclusive evidence for the Zionist state's plans for expansion. What we know about Nasser's schemes regarding Israel, by contrast, derives solely from secondary and tertiary sources. [ Shapira, 1999 ] Nevertheless, Shapira's judgement of Morris' work is that "In most instances, the result is quite balanced.".2

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 15960481.
Today
“displacement” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 2. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2005 and 2020.

Then

loosely-defined group of israeli historians who have declared as their goal the reexamination of the history of

Now

loosely defined group of israeli historians who have challenged traditional versions of israeli history

Sections that no longer exist

Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.

  • Influence on traditional Israeli historical narrative and public opinion 2,108 characters
  • Benny Morris 747 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report