The word “antisemitism” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2010. Today the opening carries none. 19 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “antisemitism” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 19.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010
Holocaust trivialization is the term used to describe the metaphorical (or otherwise comparative) use of the word "Holocaust." Numerous authors argue that such uses trivialize the meaning of the Holocaust, and many consider them offensive.1In the words of Holocaust survivor and novelist Elie Wiesel , I cannot use [the word 'Holocaust'] anymore.2 First, because there are no words, and also because it has become to trivialized that I cannot use it anymore. Whatever mishap occurs now, they call it 'holocaust'. I have seen it myself in television in the country in which I live. A commentator describing the defeat of a sports team, somewhere, called it a 'holocaust'. I have read in a very prestigious newspaper published in California, a description of the murder of six people, and the author called it a holocaust. David Stannard argued in 1996 that attempts to eliminate Holocaust comparisons belittle other events of comparable magnitude.3Antisemitism and Hate in Canada , from the League for Human Rights of Canada Comprehending the Holocaust: Historical and Literary Research , ed.4"The dangers of calling the Holocaust unique" , The Chronicle of Higher Education , August 2, 1996.5
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 276029773.
The opening as it stood in 2015 2 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Numerous authors argue that such uses trivialize the meaning of the Holocaust, and many consider them offensive. In the words of Holocaust survivor and memoirist Elie Wiesel , I cannot use [the word 'Holocaust'] anymore. First, because there are no words, and also because it has become so trivialized that I cannot use it anymore. Whatever mishap occurs now, they call it 'holocaust'. I have seen it myself in television in the country in which I live. A commentator describing the defeat of a sports team, somewhere, called it a 'holocaust'. I have read in a very prestigious newspaper published in California, a description of the murder of six people, and the author called it a holocaust. Manfred Gerstenfeld identifies trivialization and universalization of the Holocaust as one of eleven forms of Holocaust distortion.Holocaust trivialization involves the application of language that is specific to describing the Holocaust to events and purposes that are unrelated to it. Antisemitism and Hate in Canada , from the League for Human Rights of Canada Comprehending the Holocaust: Historical and Literary Research , ed. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 544972508.
The opening as it stood in 2020 2 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Idea that comparative uses of the word Holocaust trivialize the Holocaust See also: Holocaust denial Many authors argue that a metaphorical (or otherwise comparative) use of the word Holocaust constitutes Holocaust trivialization , and many consider such uses offensive. In the words of Holocaust survivor and memoirist Elie Wiesel : I cannot use [the word 'Holocaust'] anymore. First, because there are no words, and also because it has become so trivialized that I cannot use it anymore. Whatever mishap occurs now, they call it 'holocaust'. I have seen it myself in television in the country in which I live. A commentator describing the defeat of a sports team, somewhere, called it a 'holocaust'. I have read in a very prestigious newspaper published in California, a description of the murder of six people, and the author called it a holocaust. Manfred Gerstenfeld identifies trivialization and universalization of the Holocaust as one of eleven forms of Holocaust distortion. Holocaust trivialization involves the application of language that is specific to describing the Holocaust to events and purposes that are unrelated to it. On the other hand, David Stannard argued that attempts to eliminate Holocaust comparisons belittle other events of comparable magnitude. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs . "The dangers of calling the Holocaust unique" , The Chronicle of Higher Education , August 2, 1996.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 936025024.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 3 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Inappropriate comparisons or analogies that trivialize the Holocaust Holocaust trivialization is any comparison or analogy that diminishes the impact of the Holocaust , the Nazi genocide of six million European Jews during World War II .The Wiesel Commission defined trivialization as the abusive use of comparisons with the aim of minimizing the Holocaust and banalizing its atrocities.Originally, holocaust meant a type of sacrifice that is completely burnt to ashes; starting from the late 19th century, it started to denote an extensive destruction of a group, usually people or animals.The 1915 Armenian genocide was described as a "holocaust" by contemporary observers.Manfred Gerstenfeld identifies trivialization of the Holocaust as one of eleven forms of Holocaust distortion; he defines Holocaust trivialization as the application of language that is specific to describing the Holocaust to events and purposes that are unrelated to it.According to David Rudrum, examples of Holocaust trivialization include Lord Wigley invoking Auschwitz to oppose nuclear weapons and Al Gore citing Kristallnacht in defence of the environment. In the words of Holocaust survivor and memoirist Elie Wiesel , "I cannot use [the word 'Holocaust'] anymore. First, because there are no words, and also because it has become so trivialized that I cannot use it anymore. Whatever mishap occurs now, they call it 'holocaust.' I have seen it myself in television in the country in which I live. A commentator describing the defeat of a sports team, somewhere, called it a 'holocaust.' I have read in a very prestigious newspaper published in California, a description of the murder of six people, and the author called it a holocaust. So, I have no words anymore." Foxman, Abraham H.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2015). 'They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else': A History of the Armenian Genocide . Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs . The Holocaust Exhibition and Learning Centre .Comprehending the Holocaust: Historical and Literary Research .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1174353437.
The opening as it stood in 2025 6 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Inappropriate comparisons or analogies that trivialize the Holocaust Trivialization of the Holocaust is the act of making comparisons that diminish the scale and severity of the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany . The Wiesel Commission defined trivialization as the abusive use of comparisons with the aim of minimizing the Holocaust and banalizing its atrocities. Manfred Gerstenfeld identifies trivialization of the Holocaust as one of the eleven forms of Holocaust distortion; he defines Holocaust trivialization as the application of language that is specific to describing the Holocaust to events and purposes that are unrelated to it. According to David Rudrum, examples of Holocaust trivialization include Lord Wigley invoking Auschwitz to oppose nuclear weapons and Al Gore citing Kristallnacht in defence of the environment. The Holocaust survivor and memoirist Elie Wiesel wrote, "I cannot use [the word 'Holocaust'] anymore. First, because there are no words, and also because it has become so trivialized that I cannot use it anymore. Whatever mishap occurs now, they call it 'holocaust.' I have seen it myself in television in the country in which I live. A commentator describing the defeat of a sports team, somewhere, called it a 'holocaust.' I have read in a very prestigious newspaper published in California, a description of the murder of six people, and the author called it a holocaust. So, I have no words anymore." Foxman, Abraham H. Comprehending the Holocaust: Historical and Literary Research .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1295816818. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“antisemitism” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 19. Read the current article and compare.
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
antisemitism
1
1
1
0
0
genocide
0
0
0
2
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2010 and 2025.
Then
term used to describe the metaphorical
Now
act of making comparisons that diminish the scale and severity of the atrocities committed by nazi germany
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.