The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2015. Today the opening carries none. 1 remains further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 1.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2015 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2015
Targeted killing is the premeditated killing of an individual by a state organization or institution outside a judicial procedure or a battlefield.1Targeted killings were employed extensively by death squads in El Salvador , Nicaragua , Colombia , and Haiti within the context of civil unrest and war during the 1980s and 1990s. Targeted killings have also been used in Somalia , Rwanda , and in the Balkans during the Yugoslav Wars . The United States government has also practiced targeted killings, as with the killing of Osama bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki . Targeted killings have also been used by narcotics traffickers. Use of targeted killings by conventional military forces became commonplace after the Second Intifada , when Israeli security forces used the tactic to kill Palestinian opponents. Though initially opposed by the Bush Administration , targeted killings have become a frequent tactic of the United States government in the War on Terror . Instances of targeted killing by the United States that have received significant attention include the killing of Osama bin Laden and of American citizen Anwar al-Aulaqi in 2011. Under the Obama administration use of targeted killings has expanded, most frequently through use of combat drones operating in Afghanistan , Pakistan or Yemen . The legality of targeted killing is disputed.2 Some academics, military personnel and officials describe targeted killing as legitimate within the context of self-defense, when employed against terrorists or combatants engaged in asymmetrical warfare. They argue that drones are more humane and more accurate than manned vehicles.3Others, including academics such as Gregory Johnsen and Charles Schmitz, twenty-six members of Congress , some media sources ( Jeremy Scahill , James Traub ), civil rights groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and ex- CIA station chief in Islamabad , Robert Grenier have criticized targeted killings as similar to assassinations or extrajudicial killings , which are illegal within the United States and under international law .4Brym, State-directed political assassination in Israel: A political hypothesis . Council on Foreign Relations .5
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 668027045.
The opening as it stood in 2020 11 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Combat drones, such as the Predator drone , are mainly used in targeted killings.Targeted killing is defined as a form of assassination which is carried out by governments against their perceived enemies.Analysts believe that it is a modern euphemism for the assassination (prominent premeditated killing) of an individual by a state organization or institution outside a judicial procedure or a battlefield .Since the late 20th century, the legal status of targeted killing has become a subject of contention within and between various nations.Historically, at least since the mid-eighteenth century, Western thinking has generally considered the use of assassination as a tool of statecraft to be illegal. Some academics, military personnel and officials describe targeted killing as legitimate within the context of self-defense, when employed against terrorists or combatants engaged in asymmetrical warfare. They argue that drones are more humane and more accurate than manned vehicles, and that targeted or "named killings" do not occur in any context other than a declared state of war.Some twenty-six members of United States Congress , with academics such as Gregory Johnsen and Charles Schmitz, media figures ( Jeremy Scahill , Glenn Greenwald , James Traub ), civil rights groups (i.e. the American Civil Liberties Union ) and ex- CIA station chief in Islamabad , Robert Grenier , have criticized targeted killings as a form of extrajudicial killings , which may be illegal within the United States and possibly under international law .According to statistical analyses provided by Reprieve , 9 children have been killed for every targeted adult the United States has tried to assassinate, and, in numerous failed attempts to kill Ayman al-Zawahri , the CIA has killed 76 children and 29 adult bystanders.Scholars are also divided as to whether targeted killings are an effective counterterrorism strategy.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 962265665.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 5 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Removal of enemy combatants by governments against enemy forces.Targeted killings are frequently performed using unmanned combat aerial vehicles like the MQ-9 Reaper .Targeted killing is a form of assassination carried out by governments outside a judicial procedure or a battlefield . Since the late 20th century, the legal status of targeted killing has become a subject of contention within and between various nations. Historically, at least since the mid-eighteenth century, Western thinking has generally considered the use of assassination as a tool of statecraft to be illegal. Some academics, military personnel and officials describe targeted killing as legitimate within the context of self-defense, when employed against terrorists or combatants engaged in asymmetrical warfare . They argue that drones are more humane and more accurate than manned vehicles, and that targeted or "named killings" do not occur in any context other than a declared state of war. Scholars are also divided as to whether targeted killings are an effective counterterrorism strategy.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1177693227.
The opening as it stood in 2025 2 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Extrajudicial assassination by governments Modern targeted killings are frequently performed using unmanned combat aerial vehicles like the MQ-9 Reaper . Targeted killing is a form of assassination carried out by governments outside a judicial procedure or a battlefield . Since the late 20th century, the legal status of targeted killing has become a subject of contention within and between various nations. Historically, at least since the mid-eighteenth century, Western thinking has generally considered the use of assassination as a tool of statecraft to be illegal. Some academics, military personnel and officials describe targeted killing as legitimate within the context of self-defense, when employed against terrorists or combatants engaged in asymmetrical warfare . They argue that unmanned combat aerial vehicles (drones) are more humane and more accurate than manned vehicles. Scholars are also divided as to whether targeted killings are an effective counterterrorism strategy.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1298107477. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 1. Read the current article and compare.
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
disputed
1
0
0
0
terror
2
2
2
2
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2015 and 2025.
Then
premeditated killing of an individual by a state organization or institution outside a judicial procedure or a
Now
frequently performed using unmanned combat aerial vehicles like the mq-9 reaper
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
American and Russian drug cartels, 1980s569 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.