Wikipedia's first sentence called it “islamic practice of tax farming that became common in muslim asia during the buyid dynasty”. Today it says “islamic practice of farming out tax revenues yielded by land granted temporarily to army officials in place of”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the October 6, 2023 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in October 6, 2023
Islamic practice of tax farming An iqta ( ) and occasionally iqtaʿa ( ) was an Islamic practice of tax farming that became common in Muslim Asia during the Buyid dynasty .1 Iqta has been defined in Nizam-al-Mulk 's Siyasatnama . Administrators of an Iqta were known as muqti or wali . They collected land revenue and looked after general administration. Muqtiʿs ( مقطع , "holder of an iqtaʿ") had no right to interfere with the personal life of a paying person if the person stayed on the muqtiʿ's land. They were expected to send the collected revenue (after deducting collection and administration charges) to the central treasury. Such an amount to be sent was called Fawazil . Theoretically, iqtas were not hereditary by law and had to be confirmed by a higher authority like a sultan or king. However, it was made hereditary in Islamic India by Firoz Tughlaq . Individual iqtaʿ holders in Middle Eastern societies had little incentive to provide public goods to the localities assigned to them. The overarching theme was state power where the iqtaʿ was revocable and uninheritable. Though not an investment in a particular holding of land, the iqtaʿ, as a fiscal device, gave soldiers a vested interest in the regime. Iqtadar (person holding iqta) and the Sultan had a mutually dependent relationship. There could be three types of Iqtadars. First, those who were appointed by the Sultan in fully conquered territories. Second, who were appointed in partially conquered territories. These Iqtadars had to win the territories again, and hence the Sultan's control over them was relatively weaker. Third kind of Iqtadars were virtually independent, as they were appointed in unconquered territories. Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (Third ed.).
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1145798446.
The opening as it stood in 2015
Iqta‘ ( ) was an Islamic practice of tax farming that became common in Muslim Asia during the Buyid dynasty . The prominent Orientalist Claude Cahen described the Iqta‘ as follows: a form of administrative grant, often (wrongly) translated by the European word “ fief ”. The nature of the iḳṭāʿ varied according to time and place, and a translation borrowed from other systems of institutions and conceptions has served only too often to mislead Western historians, and following them, even those of the East. A mechanism had to be devised to collect the surplus from the peasantry and redistribute it among the members of the ruling class. The crucial element in this mechanism was the iqta that combined the two functions of collection and distribution without immediately endangering the unity of the political structure.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 665463640.
The opening as it stood in 2020
Iqta‘ ( ) was an Islamic practice of tax farming that became common in Muslim Asia during the Buyid dynasty . The prominent Orientalist Claude Cahen described the Iqta‘ as follows: a form of administrative grant, often (wrongly) translated by the European word " fief ". The nature of the iḳṭāʿ varied according to time and place, and a translation borrowed from other systems of institutions and conceptions has served only too often to mislead Western historians, and following them, even those of the East. Unlike European systems, the Muqtis had no right to interfere with the personal life of a paying person if the person stayed on the Muqti's land.Also, iqtas were not hereditary by law and had to be confirmed by a higher authority (like the sultan or the king).Individual iqta holders in Middle Eastern societies had little incentive to provide public goods to the localities assigned to them.The overarching theme was state power where the iqta was revocable and uninheritable.Though not an investment in a particular holding of land, the iqta—as a fiscal device—gave soldiers a vested interest in the regime. A mechanism had to be devised to collect the surplus from the peasantry and redistribute it among the members of the ruling class. The crucial element in this mechanism was the iqta that combined the two functions of collection and distribution without immediately endangering the unity of the political structure.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 964726909.
The opening as it stood in 2025
Islamic practice of tax farming An iqta ( Arabic : إقطاع , romanized : iqṭāʿ ) and occasionally iqtaʿa ( Arabic : إقطاعة ) was an Islamic practice of farming out tax revenues yielded by land granted temporarily to army officials in place of a regular wage; it became common in the Muslim empire of the Caliphate. Iqta has been defined in Nizam-al-Mulk 's Siyasatnama . Administrators of an Iqta were known as muqti or wali . They collected land revenue and looked after general administration. Muqtis ( مقطع , "holder of an iqtaʿ") had no right to interfere with the personal life of a paying person if the person stayed on the muqtiʿ's land. They were expected to send the collected revenue (after deducting collection and administration charges) to the central treasury. Such an amount to be sent was called Fawazil . Theoretically, iqtas were not hereditary by law and had to be confirmed by a higher authority like a sultan or king. However, it was made hereditary in Islamic India by Firoz Tughlaq . Individual iqtaʿ holders in Middle Eastern societies had little incentive to provide public goods to the localities assigned to them. The overarching theme was state power where the iqtaʿ was revocable and uninheritable. Though not an investment in a particular holding of land, the iqtaʿ, as a fiscal device, gave soldiers a vested interest in the regime. Iqtadar (person holding iqta) and the Sultan had a mutually dependent relationship. There could be three types of Iqtadars. First, those who were appointed by the Sultan in fully conquered territories. Second, those who were appointed in partially conquered territories. These Iqtadars had to win the territories again, and hence the Sultan's control over them was relatively weaker. The third kind of Iqtadars were virtually independent, as they were appointed in unconquered territories. Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (Third ed.).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1287504948. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “islamic practice of tax farming that became common in muslim asia during the buyid dynasty”. Today it says “islamic practice of farming out tax revenues yielded by land granted temporarily to army officials in place of”. Read the current article and compare.
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2015, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.
Then
islamic practice of tax farming that became common in muslim asia during the buyid dynasty
Now
islamic practice of farming out tax revenues yielded by land granted temporarily to army officials in place of
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.