Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Lewis Namier

Wikipedia's first sentence called it “significant british historian”. Today it says “british historian of polish-jewish background”. The one-line description Wikipedia serves to search engines and AI systems read “Namier in 1915 Sir”. It now reads “British historian (1888–1960) Namier in 1915 Sir”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

He was born Ludwik Niemirowski in Wola Okrejska in what was then Austria-Hungary and is today Poland . His familiy were secular-minded Jewish gentry . Namier was educated at universities of Lemberg ( Lviv , Ukraine ), Lausanne , and the London School of Economics . At Lausanne, he heard Vilfredo Pareto lecture and whose ideas would have much influence on him. He immigrated to Britain in 1906 and became an British subject in 1913 . During World War One , he fought as private with 20th Royal Fusiliers in 1914–15, and then various positions with Propaganda Department (1915–17), Information Department (1917–18) and finally with the Foreign Office (1918–20). After leaving the government, Namier served at Balliol College (1920–21) before going into business. Later, Namier who was an long-time Zionist worked as political secretary for the Jewish Agency in Palestine (1929–31). He served as professor at the University of Manchester from 1931 until his retirement in 1953 . He is best known for his work on parliament and its composition in the latter part of the eighteenth century , which by its very detailed study of individuals caused substantial revision to be made to accounts based on a party system.1 Namier's best known works were The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III , England in The Age of the American Revolution and the History Of Parliament series he edited later in his life.2 Namier used prosopgraphy or collective biography of every MP and peer who sat in the British Parliament in later the 18th century to reveal that local interests, not national ones, often determined how parliamentarians voted. Namier felt that prosopographical methods were the best ones for analyzing small groups like the House of Commons , but was opposed to the application of prosopography on larger groups. In addition, Namier used other sources such as wills and tax records to reveal the interests of the MPs. In his time, Namier's methods were innovative and were quite controversial. Namier's obsession with collecting facts such as club membership of various MPs and then attempting to co-relate them to voting patterns led his critics to accuse him of "taking ideas of history". He also wrote on European history, and his later books Europe in Decay , In the Nazi Era and Diplomatic Prelude unsparing condemned the Third Reich and appeasement . As someone born Jewish (Namier had converted to Anglicism ), Namier was horrified by the Holocaust and his writings on German history have criticized for Germanophobia. He was married twice and knighted in 1952. Namier held very right-wing views, and has been called the most reactionary British historian of his generation.3

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 16570892.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “significant british historian”. Today it says “british historian of polish-jewish background”. The one-line description Wikipedia serves to search engines and AI systems read “Namier in 1915 Sir”. It now reads “British historian (1888–1960) Namier in 1915 Sir”. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2005, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

significant british historian

Now

british historian of polish-jewish background

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report