Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Nizzanim culture

The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2020. Today the opening carries none, and neither does the rest of the article, references included.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2020 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2020

Map of Pottery Neolithic in the Southern Levant in Yarmukian culture Lodian (Jericho IX) culture Nizzanim culture The Nizzanim culture is a disputed archaeological culture from the Pottery Neolithic of the Southern Levant .1 It was identified in three sites in the southern coastal plain of modern Israel including the type site Nizzanim , Giv‘at Haparsa and Hof Zikim which were studied by Ya'akov Olami, Felix Burian, Erich Friedman, Shmuel Yeivin and Yosef Garfinkel .2 In those sites there were no architectural remains but pits and floor levels with hearths . These findings seem to represent a pastoral - nomadic population, similar to the precedeeing population of Pre-Pottery Neolithic Ashkelon and the Qatifian culture . Garfinkel suggests that these settlement served as seasonal hunting or fishing campsites . The dating of the Nizzanim culture is unclear mainly because no stratigraphic relations with different periods have been observed. While Garfinkel proposes that it coexisted with the Yarmukian and Lodian culture, Avi Gopher and Ram Gophna do not accept the three sites as a distinct culture and consider it to be a variant of the Lodian culture. Only one proper radiocarbon date is available (5767–5541 BCE) but dates one of the sites to the time of the Wadi Raba culture (post-dating the Yarmukian and Lodian), but this is contradicted by the findings and most archaeologists agree this site should be dated to the Pottery Neolithic ( c. 6400 - 5800 BCE ).3

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 963602928.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included. Read the current article and compare.
2020Oct '232025
disputed100
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2020 and 2025.

Then

disputed archaeological culture from the pottery neolithic of the southern levant

Now

suggested archaeological culture from the pottery neolithic of the southern levant

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report