The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2010. Today the opening carries none, and neither does the rest of the article, references included.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010
Sea Peoples ( n3 ḫ3t.w n p3 ym ) in hieroglyphs The Sea Peoples is the term used for a confederacy of seafaring raiders of the second millennium BC who sailed into the eastern Mediterranean , caused political unrest, and attempted to enter or control Egyptian territory during the late 19th dynasty and especially during Year 8 of Ramesses III of the 20th Dynasty . The Egyptian Pharaoh Merneptah explicitly refers to them by the term "the foreign-countries (or 'peoples' ) of the sea" ( Egyptian n3 ḫ3t.w n p3 ym ) in his Great Karnak Inscription . Although some scholars believe that they invaded Cyprus , Hatti and the Levant , this hypothesis is disputed.1Zangger in the external link below expresses a commonly held view that "sea peoples" does not translate this and other expressions but is an academic innovation. The Woudhuizen dissertation and the Morris paper identify Gaston Maspero as the first to use the term "peuples de la mer" in 1881.2Several articles in Oren.3
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 368575079.
The opening as it stood in 2005
Sea Peoples is the term used in ancient Egyptian records of a race of ship-faring raiders who drifted into the eastern shores of the Mediterranean and attempted to enter Egyptian territory during the late 19th dynasty , and especially year 5 of Rameses III of the 20th Dynasty .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 17846943.
The opening as it stood in 2015 4 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Emmanuel de Rougé's translation of the North wall of the mortuary temple of Ramesses III at Medinet Habu led him to coin the term "Sea Peoples".This famous scene shows what has come to be known as the Battle of the Delta .The Sea Peoples were conjectured groups of seafaring raiders, originating from either western Anatolia or southern Europe , specifically a region of the Aegean Sea .They are conjectured to have sailed around the eastern Mediterranean and invaded Anatolia, Syria , Canaan , Cyprus , and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age .French Egyptologist Emmanuel de Rougé first used the term "peuples de la mer" (literally "peoples of the sea") in 1855 in a translation of reliefs at Medinet Habu documenting year 8 of Ramesses III .The term Sea Peoples, and the accompanying migration theory, were subsequently popularized by Gaston Maspero , de Rougé's successor at the Collège de France , in the late 19th century.The historical narrative is primarily drawn from seven Ancient Egyptian sources, and although in these inscriptions the designation "of the sea" appears in relation to only three groups of people (the Sherden , Shekelesh , and Eqwesh ), the term "Sea Peoples" is commonly used to refer to the following nine peoples, in alphabetical order: the Denyen , identified by some with the Greek Danaoi and by others with the Israelite tribe of Dan ; the Ekwesh , possibly a group of Bronze Age Greeks ( Achaeans ); the Lukka , an Anatolian people of the Aegean who may have given their name to the region of Lycia and the Lycian language ; the Peleset, whose name is generally believed to refer to the Philistines ; the Shekelesh, identified possibly with the Italic people called Siculi (from Sicily ); the Sherden, possibly Sardinians or people of Sardis ; the Teresh , i.e. the Tyrrhenians , possibly ancestors of the Etruscans ; the Tjeker , also known as the Sikil and possibly Greek Teucrians ; the Weshesh .Evidence for migrations of whole peoples are not found on any of the contemporary inscriptions, but versions of a "migration hypothesis" represent a widely held interpretation among scholars of the ancient Near East.Maspero (1896), the somewhat misleading term "Sea Peoples" encompasses the ethnonyms Lukka, Sherden, Shekelesh, Teresh, Eqwesh, Denyen, Sikil / Tjekker, Weshesh, and Peleset (Philistines).[Footnote: The modern term "Sea Peoples" refers to peoples that appear in several New Kingdom Egyptian texts as originating from "islands" (tables 1-2; Adams and Cohen, this volume; see, e.g., Drews 1993, 57 for a summary).The use of quotation marks in association with the term "Sea Peoples" in our title is intended to draw attention to the problematic nature of this commonly used term.It is noteworthy that the designation "of the sea" appears only in relation to the Sherden, Shekelesh, and Eqwesh.Subsequently, this term was applied somewhat indiscriminately to several additional ethnonyms, including the Philistines, who are portrayed in their earliest appearance as invaders from the north during the reigns of Merenptah and Ramesses Ill (see, e.g., Sandars 1978; Redford 1992, 243, n. 14; for a recent review of the primary and secondary literature, see Woudhuizen 2006).Hencefore the term Sea Peoples will appear without quotation marks.]" The End of the Bronze Age: Changes in Warfare and the Catastrophe Ca. 1200 B.C., Robert Drews, p48–61 Quote: "The thesis that a great "migration of the Sea Peoples" occurred ca. 1200 B.C. is supposedly based on Egyptian inscriptions, one from the reign of Merneptah and another from the reign of Ramesses III.Yet in the inscriptions themselves such a migration nowhere appears.After reviewing what the Egyptian texts have to say about 'the sea peoples', one Egyptologist (Wolfgang Helck) recently remarked that although some things are unclear, "eins ist aber sicher: Nach den ägyptischen Texten haben wir es nicht mit einer 'Völkerwanderung' zu tun." Thus the migration hypothesis is based not on the inscriptions themselves but on their interpretation." "Syria: Early history" .Les habitants de l'île de Chypre durent nécessairement prendre parti dans cette guerre; peut-ètre les Kefas étaient-ils alors les alliés de l'Egypte.En tout cas, notre inscription ne détaille pas les noms de ces peuples, venus des îles de Ia Méditerranée.Champollion a fait remarquer que les T'akkari [qu'il nomme Fekkaros; voyez l'appendice à la suite de cette notice] et les Schartana, étaient reconnaissables, dans les vaisseaux ennemis, à leurs coiffures singulières.De plus, dans les écussons des peuples vaincus, les Schartana et les Touirasch portent la désignation de peuples de la mer.II est donc probable qu'ils appartiennent à ces nations venues des iles ou des còtes de l'Archipel.Les Rabou sont encore reconnaissables parmi les prisonniers.[Translation] : "For a long time Kefa has been identified, with verisimilitude , with Caphthorim of the Bible, particularly Genesis, with most interpreters assigning their residence to the islands of Crete or Cyprus.The people of Cyprus had certainly to take sides in this war; perhaps they were then the allies of Egypt.In any case, our entry does not detail the names of these people, from the islands of the Mediterranean.Champollion noted that T'akkari [which he names Fekkaros; see appendix at the following entry] and Schartana , were recognizable, in enemy ships, and with unique hairstyles.In addition, in the crests of the conquered peoples, the Schartana and the Touirasch bear the designation of the peoples of the sea.It is therefore likely that they belong to these nations from islands or coasts of the archipelago. Zangger expresses a commonly held view that "Sea Peoples" does not translate this and other expressions but is an academic innovation. Woudhuizen and Morris identify Gaston Maspero as the first to use the term "peuples de la mer" in 1881.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 667563276.
The opening as it stood in 2020 7 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Purported ancient seafaring confederation of invaders This famous scene from the north wall of Medinet Habu is often used to illustrate the Egyptian campaign against the Sea Peoples in what has come to be known as the Battle of the Delta .Whilst accompanying hieroglyphs do not name Egypt's enemies, describing them simply as being from "northern countries", early scholars noted the similarities between the hairstyles and accessories worn by the combatants and other reliefs in which such groups are named.The Sea Peoples are a purported seafaring confederation that attacked ancient Egypt and other regions of the East Mediterranean prior to and during the Late Bronze Age collapse (1200–900 BCE).Following the creation of the concept in the nineteenth century, it became one of the most famous chapters of Egyptian history, given its connection with, in the words of Wilhelm Max Müller : "the most important questions of ethnography and the primitive history of classic nations".Their origins undocumented, the various Sea Peoples have been proposed to have originated from places that include western Asia Minor , the Aegean , the Mediterranean islands and Southern Europe .Although the archaeological inscriptions do not include reference to a migration, the Sea Peoples are conjectured to have sailed around the eastern Mediterranean and invaded Anatolia , Syria , Phoenicia , Canaan , Cyprus and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age .French Egyptologist Emmanuel de Rougé first used the term peuples de la mer (literally "peoples of the sea") in 1855 in a description of reliefs on the Second Pylon at Medinet Habu documenting Year 8 of Ramesses III .Gaston Maspero , de Rougé's successor at the Collège de France , subsequently popularized the term "Sea Peoples" — and an associated migration-theory — in the late 19th century.Since the early 1990s, his migration theory has been brought into question by a number of scholars.The Sea Peoples remain unidentified in the eyes of most modern scholars and hypotheses regarding the origin of the various groups are the source of much speculation.Existing theories variously propose equating them with several Aegean tribes, raiders from Central Europe , scattered soldiers who turned to piracy or who had become refugees , and links with natural disasters such as earthquakes or climatic shifts. Maspero (1896), the somewhat misleading term 'Sea Peoples' encompasses the ethnonyms Lukka, Sherden, Shekelesh, Teresh, Eqwesh, Denyen, Sikil / Tjekker, Weshesh, and Peleset (Philistines). [Footnote: The modern term 'Sea Peoples' refers to peoples that appear in several New Kingdom Egyptian texts as originating from 'islands' (tables 1–2; Adams and Cohen, this volume; see, e.g., Drews 1993, 57 for a summary). The use of quotation marks in association with the term 'Sea Peoples' in our title is intended to draw attention to the problematic nature of this commonly used term. It is noteworthy that the designation 'of the sea' appears only in relation to the Sherden, Shekelesh and Eqwesh. Subsequently, this term was applied somewhat indiscriminately to several additional ethnonyms, including the Philistines, who are portrayed in their earliest appearance as invaders from the north during the reigns of Merenptah and Ramesses Ill (see, e.g., Sandars 1978; Redford 1992, 243, n. 14; for a recent review of the primary and secondary literature, see Woudhuizen 2006 ). Yet in the inscriptions themselves, such a migration nowhere appears. After reviewing what the Egyptian texts have to say about 'the sea peoples', one Egyptologist (Wolfgang Helck) recently remarked that although some things are unclear, 'eins ist aber sicher: Nach den ägyptischen Texten haben wir es nicht mit einer "Völkerwanderung" zu tun' ['One thing is however certain: according to the Egyptian texts we are not dealing with a "migration"'] Thus the migration hypothesis is based not on the inscriptions themselves but on their interpretation". Les habitants de l'île de Chypre durent nécessairement prendre parti dans cette guerre; peut-être les Kefas étaient-ils alors les alliés de l'Egypte. En tout cas, notre inscription ne détaille pas les noms de ces peuples, venus des îles de la Méditerranée. Champollion a fait remarquer que les T'akkari [qu'il nomme Fekkaros; voyez l'appendice à la suite de cette notice] et les Schartana, étaient reconnaissables, dans les vaisseaux ennemis, à leurs coiffures singulières. De plus, dans les écussons des peuples vaincus, les Schartana et les Touirasch portent la désignation de peuples de la mer. Il est donc probable qu'ils appartiennent à ces nations venues des îles ou des côtes de l'Archipel. Les Rabou sont encore reconnaissables parmi les prisonniers. [Translation] : "For a long time Kefa has been identified, with verisimilitude , with Caphthorim of the Bible, to whom Gesenius, along with most interpreters, assigns as a residence the islands of Crete or Cyprus. The people of Cyprus had certainly to take sides in this war; perhaps they were then the allies of Egypt. In any case, our entry does not detail the names of these people, from the islands of the Mediterranean. Champollion noted that T'akkari [which he names Fekkaros; see appendix at the following entry] and Schartana , were recognizable, in enemy ships, with unique hairstyles. In addition, in the crests of the conquered peoples, the Schartana and the Touirasch bear the designation of the peoples of the sea. It is therefore likely that they belong to these nations from islands or coasts of the archipelago. American Schools of Oriental Research .The simple answer is that there is no simple answer.It remains an archaeological mystery that is the subject of much debate even today, more than 150 years after the discussions first began.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 965054216.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 8 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Purported ancient seafaring confederation of invaders For other uses, see Sea People (disambiguation) . This scene from the north wall of Medinet Habu is often used to illustrate the Egyptian campaign against the Sea Peoples in what has come to be known as the Battle of the Delta , during the reign of Ramesses III. While accompanying hieroglyphs do not name Egypt's enemies, describing them simply as being from "northern countries", early scholars noted the similarities between the hairstyles and accessories worn by the combatants and other reliefs in which such groups are named. The Sea Peoples are a hypothesized seafaring confederation that attacked ancient Egypt and other regions in the East Mediterranean before and during the Late Bronze Age collapse (1200–900 BCE ). Following the creation of the concept in the 19th century, the Sea Peoples' incursions became one of the most famous chapters of Egyptian history, given its connection with, in the words of Wilhelm Max Müller , "the most important questions of ethnography and the primitive history of classic nations". The origins of the Sea Peoples are undocumented.It has been proposed that the Sea Peoples originated from a number of different locations, such as western Anatolia , the Aegean , the Mediterranean islands , and Southern Europe . Although the archaeological inscriptions do not include reference to a migration, the Sea Peoples are conjectured to have sailed around the eastern Mediterranean and raided Anatolia, Syria , Phoenicia , Canaan , Cyprus , and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age . French Egyptologist Emmanuel de Rougé first used the term peuples de la mer (literally "peoples of the sea") in 1855 in a description of reliefs on the Second Pylon at Medinet Habu , documenting Year 8 of Ramesses III . In the late 19th century, Gaston Maspero , de Rougé's successor at the Collège de France , subsequently popularized the term "Sea Peoples" and an associated migration theory. Since the early 1990s, his migration theory has been brought into question by a number of scholars. The Sea Peoples remain unidentified in the eyes of most modern scholars, and hypotheses regarding the origin of the various groups are the source of much speculation. Existing theories variously propose that they were any of several Aegean tribes, raiders from Central Europe , scattered soldiers who turned to piracy or became refugees , or even migrants linked to natural disasters such as earthquakes or climatic shifts. Maspero (1896), the somewhat misleading term 'Sea Peoples' encompasses the ethnonyms Lukka, Sherden, Shekelesh, Teresh, Eqwesh, Denyen, Sikil / Tjekker, Weshesh, and Peleset (Philistines). [Footnote: The modern term 'Sea Peoples' refers to people that appear in several New Kingdom Egyptian texts as originating from 'islands' (tables 1–2; Adams and Cohen, this volume; see, e.g., Drews 1993, 57 for a summary). The use of quotation marks in association with the term 'Sea Peoples' in our title is intended to draw attention to the problematic nature of this commonly used term. The designation 'of the sea' appears only in relation to the Sherden, Shekelesh and Eqwesh. Subsequently, this term was applied somewhat indiscriminately to several additional ethnonyms, including the Philistines, who are portrayed in their earliest appearance as invaders from the north during the reigns of Merenptah and Ramesses Ill (see, e.g., Sandars 1978; Redford 1992, 243, n. 14; for a recent review of the primary and secondary literature, see Woudhuizen 2006 ). Yet in the inscriptions themselves, such a migration nowhere appears. After reviewing what the Egyptian texts have to say about 'the sea peoples', one Egyptologist (Wolfgang Helck) recently remarked that although some things are unclear, 'eins ist aber sicher: Nach den ägyptischen Texten haben wir es nicht mit einer "Völkerwanderung" zu tun' ['One thing is however certain: according to the Egyptian texts we are not dealing with a "migration"'] Thus the migration hypothesis is based not on the inscriptions themselves but on their interpretation". The people of Cyprus had certainly to take sides in this war; perhaps they were then the allies of Egypt. In any case, our entry does not detail the names of these people, from the islands of the Mediterranean. Champollion noted that T'akkari [which he names Fekkaros; see appendix at the following entry] and Schartana , were recognizable, in enemy ships, with unique hairstyles. In addition, in the crests of the conquered peoples, the Schartana and the Touirasch bear the designation of the peoples of the sea. It is therefore likely that they belong to these nations from islands or coasts of the archipelago. American Schools of Oriental Research . The simple answer is that there is no simple answer. It remains an archaeological mystery that is the subject of much debate even today, more than 150 years after the discussions first began.
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1175806190.
The opening as it stood in 2025 24 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Purported ancient tribal confederation of the Late Bronze Age For other uses, see Sea People (disambiguation) . This scene from the north wall of Medinet Habu is often used to illustrate the Egyptian campaign against the Sea Peoples, in what has come to be known as the Battle of the Delta ( c. 1175 BC), during the reign of Ramesses III. While accompanying hieroglyphs do not name Egypt's enemies, describing them simply as being from "northern countries", early scholars noted the similarities between the hairstyles and accessories worn by the combatants and other reliefs in which such groups are named. The Sea Peoples were a group of tribes hypothesized to have attacked Egypt and other Eastern Mediterranean regions around 1200 BC during the Late Bronze Age .The hypothesis was proposed by the 19th-century Egyptologists Emmanuel de Rougé and Gaston Maspero , on the basis of primary sources such as the reliefs on the Mortuary Temple of Ramesses III at Medinet Habu .Subsequent research developed the hypothesis further, attempting to link these sources to other Late Bronze Age evidence of migration, piracy, and destruction.While initial versions of the hypothesis regarded the Sea Peoples as a primary cause of the Late Bronze Age collapse , more recent versions generally regard them as a symptom of events which were already in motion before their purported attacks.The Sea Peoples included well-attested groups such as the Lukka , as well as others such as the Weshesh whose origins are unknown. Hypotheses regarding the origin of the various groups are the source of much speculation. Several of them appear to have been Aegean tribes, while others may have originated in Sicily , Sardinia , Cyprus , and Western Anatolia .The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1295481672. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
disputed
0
1
0
0
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2005 and 6 October 2023.
Then
term used in ancient egyptian records of a race of ship-faring raiders who drifted into the eastern shores of t
Now
often used to illustrate the egyptian campaign against the sea peoples in what has come to be known as the batt
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
Nuragic and Italian peoples hypotheses2,550 characters
Anatolian famine hypothesis1,612 characters
Invader hypothesis1,210 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.