The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “leaked labour party dossier written by party staff in response to the equality and human rights commission 's i”. Today it says “leaked british dossier written by party staff in response to the equality and human rights commission 's invest”. Sections present on October 6, 2023 no longer exist: “Contents of the report; Investigation into scandal”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-04.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2025 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2025
The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019 , is a leaked British dossier written by party staff in response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission 's investigation into the party's handling of antisemitism complaints. The report includes emails of senior party staff, aligned with the right of the party, and suggests factionalism within the party ultimately led to antisemitism and racism allegations not being dealt with properly. The dossier was first reported by Tom Rayner, political correspondent at Sky News , on 11 April 2020. He reported that Labour's lawyers had advised against submitting the report to the commission. The dossier was subsequently leaked on social media. Keir Starmer , Leader of the Labour Party , and Angela Rayner , Deputy Leader of the Labour Party , announced an investigation into the report the following day. HOPE not hate welcomed the dossier's statement that it "thoroughly disproves any suggestion that antisemitism is not a problem in the Party", and also called on the party to investigate the racism it details against Diane Abbott . The dossier was criticised by the Campaign Against Antisemitism , which suggested it had been written to absolve the Corbyn leadership of failing to deal with antisemitism. The resulting inquiry into the dossier, headed by Martin Ford KC, published its report on 19 July 2022. The Forde Report concluded that antisemitism had been used as a "factional weapon" by both opponents and supporters of Corbyn in the Labour Party, which impeded investigation into antisemitism complaints. It also supported the dossier's claims of racism and discrimination in the party more generally, suggesting there was a "hierarchy of racism", and made 165 recommendations to address the "toxic" culture within the party. Some close to Mr. Corbyn are furious, with one saying: 'the truth must come out' " ( Tweet ) . "Labour leader Keir Starmer announces 'urgent investigation' into leaked party antisemitism report" . HOPE not hate . 14 April 2020 . "Labour's mammoth report detailing anti-Corbyn conspiracy at Party's HQ is 'last ditch attempt to discredit antisemitism allegations' and must be sent to EHRC" .
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1290189626.
The opening as it stood in 2020
The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019 is a leaked Labour Party dossier written by party staff in response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission 's investigation into the party's handling of antisemitism complaints and includes reports of other forms of racism. The report reveals emails of senior party management staff, aligned with the right of the party, wherein there was clear obstruction of justice in dealing with cases of antisemitism and other noted cases of racism, and it does not clear the party of accusations of being "institutionally antisemitic". Although the report clearly states that it "thoroughly disproves any suggestion that antisemitism is not a problem in the Party", or that it is all a 'smear' or a 'witch-hunt', its main assertion is that rampant factionalism within the party had ultimately led to antisemitism and racism allegations not being dealt with properly. The dossier was first reported by Tom Rayner, political correspondent at Sky News , on Twitter on 11 April 2020, then on Sky News itself a day later. He reported that Labour's lawyers had advised against submitting the report to the Commission. The news of this dossier had many activists calling for its full publication; it finally leaked and spread through social media. Labour leader Keir Starmer and deputy leader Angela Rayner then announced an investigation into the report the following day. Some close to Mr. "NEW: Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner are commissioning an urgent investigation into the internal report" ( Tweet ) .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 964561178.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 4 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
British Labour Party dossier The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism 2014–2019 , is a report written by party staff in response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission 's investigation into the party's handling of antisemitism complaints and includes claims of other forms of racism . The report reveals emails of senior party management staff, aligned with the right of the party, and highlights obstruction of justice in dealing with clear evidence of racism and bullying.And, while it might not fully clear the party of accusations of being 'antisemitic', the report does indicate that anti-semitism is not a major problem with in the Labour Party, its main assertion is that rampant factionalism/right wing bullying within the party had ultimately led to claims of antisemitism and racism allegations not being dealt with properly. The Report was first highlighted by Tom Rayner, political correspondent at Sky News , on Twitter on 11 April 2020, then on Sky News itself a day later. He reported that Labour's lawyers had 'advised' against submitting the report to the commission'. The news of this Report had many Labour supporters calling for its full publication.Keir Starmer , Leader of the Labour Party , and Angela Rayner , Deputy Leader of the Labour Party , announced an investigation into the report the following day.HOPE not hate . 14 April 2020 .Many party members were furious, with one saying: the truth must come out" ( Tweet ) .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1171239187.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “leaked labour party dossier written by party staff in response to the equality and human rights commission 's i”. Today it says “leaked british dossier written by party staff in response to the equality and human rights commission 's invest”. Sections present on October 6, 2023 no longer exist: “Contents of the report; Investigation into scandal”. Read the current article and compare.
2020
Oct '23
2025
antisemitism
6
5
8
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
What Wikipedia says this is
Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2020, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.
Then
leaked labour party dossier written by party staff in response to the equality and human rights commission 's i
Now
leaked british dossier written by party staff in response to the equality and human rights commission 's invest
Sections that no longer exist
This section existed on October 6, 2023. It is gone today. The current article has no similar heading in its place, and the article is shorter overall. So this is not a heading that got renamed, and it is not a topic that got folded into a bigger section. 2 sections of 400 characters or more gone since October 6 2023, with the article 1,788 characters shorter.
Contents of the report
Investigation into scandal
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.
