Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Toledot Yeshu

The word “antisemitism” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2015. Today the opening carries none. 1 remains further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “antisemitism” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 1.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2015 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2015

Toledot Yeshu (ספר תולדות ישו, The Book of the Generations/History/Life of Jesus ), often abbreviated as Toledoth Jeschu is a medieval “anti-gospel”, a parody of the Christian gospel . It exists in a number of different versions, none of which are considered either canonical or normative within rabbinic literature , but which appear to have been widely circulated in Europe and the Middle East in the medieval period (though some scholars disagree with this claim).1 The stories claim that Jesus was an illegitimate child, and that he practiced magic and heresy , seduced women, and died a shameful death. But they also show a paradoxical respect for Jesus.2 As Joseph Dan notes in the Encyclopedia Judaica , "The narrative in all versions treats Jesus as an exceptional person who from his youth demonstrated unusual wit and wisdom, but disrespect toward his elders and the sages of his age." Robert Van Voorst calls the Toledot a record of popular polemic "run wild".3 The Toledot’s profane portrayal of the person Christians consider divine has provided material for antisemitic polemics.4 Both Jewish and Christian scholars in modern times have paid little attention to the Toledot.5 The opinion of Father Edward H.6 Flannery is representative: This scurrilous fable of the life of Jesus is a medieval work, probably written down in the tenth century. .... Though its contents enjoyed a certain currency in the oral traditions of the Jewish masses, it was almost totally ignored by official or scholarly Judaism. Anti-Semites have not failed to employ it as an illustration of the blasphemous character of the Synagogue ." This disregard has recently been lifting as the text becomes discussed as a possible window into the early history of polemic between Christians and Jews . In Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (ed.).7 Roland Worth, Jr. writes: "The distribution of the work within the Jewish communities seems to have been modest." Worth, Roland H., Jr., Alternative Lives of Jesus: Noncanonical accounts through the early middle ages (2003, NC, McFarland & Co.) page 50, citing Morris Goldstein, Jesus in the Jewish Tradition (1950, NY, Macmillan) page 166. By most it was even at this time regarded as a jest, a dubious after-dinner take for Christmas eve, and those who retailed its sordid details only faintly associated the principal character with the Jesus of the Christians." Webster, Nesta H (2000).8 Secret Societies and Subversive Movements . Saracens: Islam in the Medieval European Imagination .

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 663214085.
Today
“antisemitism” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 1. Read the current article and compare.
201020152020Oct '232025
antisemitism02220
disputed00010
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2010 and 2025.

Then

medieval version of the story of jesus from a non-christian perspective and an expression of vulgar jewish pole

Now

set of jewish

Sections that no longer exist

Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.

  • Composition and dating 4,720 characters
  • Christian response 1,032 characters
  • Strassburg Manuscript 1,120 characters
  • Parallels 419 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report