Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Zaky Mallah

In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “australian who has been charged but found not guilty under australia's anti-terrorism laws”. Today it says “australian who was the first to be charged with terror offences under australia's anti-terrorism act after he m”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “australian who has been charged but found not guilty under australia's anti-terrorism laws”. Today it says “australian who was the first to be charged with terror offences under australia's anti-terrorism act after he m”.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2025 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2025

Zaky Mallah is an Australian who was the first to be charged with terror offences under Australia's anti-terrorism act after he made a video which allegedly contained a threat to carry out a suicide attack on federal government offices in Sydney in 2003. He was acquitted of two terrorism charges in 2005, but pleaded guilty to a third charge of threatening violence against Commonwealth officials. In 2011 Mallah travelled to Syria to film the Syrian Civil War , declaring himself in support of the Free Syrian Army . In 2015 he was controversially allowed to ask a question on the ABC program Q&A, leading then Prime Minister of Australia Tony Abbott to question "Which side is the ABC on?" "Oz jihadist charged for issuing 'how-to survive' holy war list on Facebook" . Sydney , Australia: Business Insider . 18 May 2013. An Australian has been charged under anti-terrorist laws for issuing a how-to list on Facebook for how young men can engage in holy war without getting killed or ending up in Guantanamo Bay.

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 1294994153.
Today
In 2005 Wikipedia's first sentence called it “australian who has been charged but found not guilty under australia's anti-terrorism laws”. Today it says “australian who was the first to be charged with terror offences under australia's anti-terrorism act after he m”. Read the current article and compare.
20152020Oct '232025
terror2116
jihad1111
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined between 2015 and 2025.

Then

australian who has been charged but found not guilty under australia's anti-terrorism laws

Now

australian who was the first to be charged with terror offences under australia's anti-terrorism act after he m

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report