Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Jahwist

Wikipedia's first sentence called it “one of the sources of the torah postulated by the documentary hypothesis this article describes the opinion of”. Today it says “shown as j”. Sections present on October 6, 2023 no longer exist: “Relationship between humans and soil; The separation between the divine and human; Progressive human corruption”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2015 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2015

Jahwist , or Yahwist , often abbreviated J , is one of the sources of the Pentateuch ( Torah ), together with the Deuteronomist , the Elohist and the Priestly source .1 It gets its name from the fact that it characteristically uses the term Yahweh (German Javeh, Hebrew YHWH ) for God in the book of Genesis. During most of the 20th century the dominant belief among scholars was that the Torah had been composed by intertwining four originally separate and complete documents, of which the Yahwist was one—this was called the documentary hypothesis . In the last quarter of the 20th century the consensus over the documentary hypothesis unravelled, and although it still has supporters there are now many alternatives. These alternatives can be broadly divided between "fragmentary" and "supplementary" models (hypotheses). Fragmentary hypotheses, seen notably in the work of Rolf Rendtorff and Erhard Blum, see the Pentateuch as growing through the gradual accretion of material into larger and larger blocks before being joined together, first by a Deuteronomic writer ("Deuteronomic" means related to the Book of Deuteronomy, which was composed in the late 7th century BCE), and then by a Priestly writer (6th/5th century BCE), who also added his own material. The "supplementary" approach is exemplified in the work of John Van Seters , who sees J (which he, unlike the "fragmentists", sees as a complete document) being composed in the 6th century BCE as an introduction to the Deuteronomistic history , the history of Israel that takes up the series of books from Joshua to Kings . The Priestly writers later added supplements to this (hence the term "supplementary") in a process that continued down to the end of the 4th century BCE.2

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 664986305.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “one of the sources of the torah postulated by the documentary hypothesis this article describes the opinion of”. Today it says “shown as j”. Sections present on October 6, 2023 no longer exist: “Relationship between humans and soil; The separation between the divine and human; Progressive human corruption”. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2005, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

one of the sources of the torah postulated by the documentary hypothesis this article describes the opinion of

Now

shown as j

Sections that no longer exist

Present on October 6, 2023, absent today, with no near-matching heading in the current article and the article shorter overall, so this is not a renamed heading or a topic absorbed into a fuller treatment. 3 sections of 400 characters or more gone since October 6 2023, with the article 527 characters shorter.

  • Relationship between humans and soil
  • The separation between the divine and human
  • Progressive human corruption
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report