Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Religious violence

The word “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2020. Today the opening carries none. 66 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 66.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2020 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2020

The Crusades were a series of military campaigns fought mainly between Roman Catholic Europe and Muslims . Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade . sidebar Religious violence is a term that covers phenomena where religion is either the subject or the object of violent behavior .1 Religious violence is violence that is motivated by, or in reaction to, religious precepts, texts, or the doctrines of a target or an attacker. It includes violence against religious institutions, people, objects, or events. Religious violence does not exclusively refer to acts which are committed by religious groups, instead, includes acts which are committed against religious groups.2 "Violence" is a very broad concept that is difficult to define since it is used on both human and non-human objects.3 Furthermore, the term can denote a wide variety of experiences such as blood shedding, physical harm, forcing against personal freedom, passionate conduct or language, or emotions such as fury and passion.4 "Religion" is a complex and problematic modern western concept.5 Though there is no scholarly consensus over what a religion is, in general, religion is conceived today as an abstraction which entails beliefs, doctrines, and sacred places.6 The link between religious belief and behavior is problematic. Decades of anthropological, sociological, and psychological research has shown that the assumption that behaviors follow directly from religious beliefs and values is false because people's religious ideas are fragmented, loosely connected, and context-dependent just like in all other domains of culture and life.7 In general, religions, ethical systems, and societies rarely promote violence as an end in itself since violence is universally undesirable. At the same time, there is a universal tension between the general desire to avoid violence and the acceptance of justifiable uses of violence to prevent a "greater evil" that permeates all cultures.8 Religious violence, like all violence, is a cultural process that is context-dependent and very complex. Oversimplifications of "religion" and "violence" often lead to misguided understandings of causes for why some people commit acts of violence and why most people do not commit such acts in the first place.9 Violence is perpetrated for a wide variety of ideological reasons and religion is generally only one of many contributing social and political factors that can lead to unrest. Studies of supposed cases of religious violence often conclude that violence is strongly driven by ethnic animosities rather than by religious worldviews.10 Recently, scholars have questioned the very concept of "religious violence" and the extent to which religious, political, economic , or ethnic aspects of a conflict are even meaningful. Some observe that the very concept of "religion" is a modern invention and not something that is historical or universal across cultures, which makes "religious violence" a modern myth. Since all cases of violence include social, political, and economic dimensions; there is no consensus on definitions of "religion", and no way to isolate "religion" from the rest of the more likely motivational dimensions, it is incorrect to label any violent event as "religious". Numerous cases of supposed acts of religious violence such as the Thirty Years War , the French Wars of Religion , the Protestant-Catholic conflict in Ireland , the Sri Lankan Civil War , 9/11 and other terrorist attacks, the Bosnian War , and the Rwandan Civil War were all primarily motivated by social, political, and economic issues rather than religion.11 Peacemaking and the Challenge of Violence in World Religions . The Myth of Religious Violence .12

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 961339660.
Today
“terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 66. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
terror000100
jihad010000
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

Sections that no longer exist

Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.

  • Secularism as a response 1,000 characters
  • Terrorism and Islam 2,379 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report