The word “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2020. Today the opening carries none. 66 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 66.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2020 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2020
The Crusades were a series of military campaigns fought mainly between Roman Catholic Europe and Muslims . Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade . sidebar Religious violence is a term that covers phenomena where religion is either the subject or the object of violent behavior .1 Religious violence is violence that is motivated by, or in reaction to, religious precepts, texts, or the doctrines of a target or an attacker. It includes violence against religious institutions, people, objects, or events. Religious violence does not exclusively refer to acts which are committed by religious groups, instead, includes acts which are committed against religious groups.2"Violence" is a very broad concept that is difficult to define since it is used on both human and non-human objects.3Furthermore, the term can denote a wide variety of experiences such as blood shedding, physical harm, forcing against personal freedom, passionate conduct or language, or emotions such as fury and passion.4"Religion" is a complex and problematic modern western concept.5Though there is no scholarly consensus over what a religion is, in general, religion is conceived today as an abstraction which entails beliefs, doctrines, and sacred places.6 The link between religious belief and behavior is problematic. Decades of anthropological, sociological, and psychological research has shown that the assumption that behaviors follow directly from religious beliefs and values is false because people's religious ideas are fragmented, loosely connected, and context-dependent just like in all other domains of culture and life.7In general, religions, ethical systems, and societies rarely promote violence as an end in itself since violence is universally undesirable. At the same time, there is a universal tension between the general desire to avoid violence and the acceptance of justifiable uses of violence to prevent a "greater evil" that permeates all cultures.8Religious violence, like all violence, is a cultural process that is context-dependent and very complex. Oversimplifications of "religion" and "violence" often lead to misguided understandings of causes for why some people commit acts of violence and why most people do not commit such acts in the first place.9 Violence is perpetrated for a wide variety of ideological reasons and religion is generally only one of many contributing social and political factors that can lead to unrest. Studies of supposed cases of religious violence often conclude that violence is strongly driven by ethnic animosities rather than by religious worldviews.10Recently, scholars have questioned the very concept of "religious violence" and the extent to which religious, political, economic , or ethnic aspects of a conflict are even meaningful. Some observe that the very concept of "religion" is a modern invention and not something that is historical or universal across cultures, which makes "religious violence" a modern myth. Since all cases of violence include social, political, and economic dimensions; there is no consensus on definitions of "religion", and no way to isolate "religion" from the rest of the more likely motivational dimensions, it is incorrect to label any violent event as "religious". Numerous cases of supposed acts of religious violence such as the Thirty Years War , the French Wars of Religion , the Protestant-Catholic conflict in Ireland , the Sri Lankan Civil War , 9/11 and other terrorist attacks, the Bosnian War , and the Rwandan Civil War were all primarily motivated by social, political, and economic issues rather than religion.11 Peacemaking and the Challenge of Violence in World Religions . The Myth of Religious Violence .12
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 961339660.
The opening as it stood in 2005
Religious violence is a term that encompasses the use of force by members of a religion to enforce their worldview upon those whose beliefs differ from their own or to use religious propaganda to further a social or political agenda. It is a consequence of religious intolerance and in extreme instances can lead to a religious war . In most instances, serious religious violence is perpetrated by individuals whose zeal and conviction exceed that of an average member of the religion in question, although milder forms, such as verbal abuse or ostracism, can be habitually practiced by larger communities. The range of religious violence is varied, and in its more serious forms it often involves illegal means (although in some instances, the use of religious violence can be sanctioned and even undertaken by the government), such as physical abuse and vandalism, and in more extreme cases, torture or murder. The September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center are an extreme example of religious violence. It's worth noting that even though in many instances religion is used to justify violent behavior, the immediate motivations of the individuals involved may not be religious as such and the overall goals of such behavior may be cultural, personal or even economical. An example of this is the organized violence directed against black people during the American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968) - the Ku Klux Klan made a strong point of being a Christian organization and often used this to justify its active stance against desegregation and racial integration , but despite this, the Klan's actions were motivated more by racism and intolerance than religious beliefs. Contrast with sectarian violence , which is conflict between different sects of one religion. v t e
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 17377686.
The opening as it stood in 2010 8 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
The Crusades were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between Christian Europe and Muslims .Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade .They were inspired at the jihad of the Islam civilization.Religious violence and extremism (also called communal violence ) is a term that covers all phenomena where religion , in any of its forms, is either the subject or object of individual or collective violent behaviour.Concretely, it covers both violence by religiously motivated individuals or religious institutions of any kind, of the same religion, a different sect, or secular targets.The other case is of violence of any kind against objects that are explicitly religious (such as religious institutions, the persecution of people on the basis of their religion, religious buildings or sites).Religious violence, like all violence, is an inherently cultural process whose meanings are context-dependent.Religious violence often tends to place great emphasis on the symbolic aspect of the act.Religious violence is primarily the domain of the violent "actor", which may be distinguished between individual and collective forms of violence.(2000) The Deadly Ethnic Riot.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion . 43 .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 365793461.
The opening as it stood in 2015 5 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
The Crusades were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between Christian Europe and Muslims . Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade . Religious violence is a term that covers phenomena where religion is either the subject or object of violent behavior .Religious violence is, specifically, violence that is motivated by or in reaction to religious precepts, texts, or doctrines.This includes violence against religious institutions, people, objects, or when the violence is motivated to some degree by some religious aspect of the target or precept of the attacker.Religious violence does not refer exclusively to acts committed by religious groups, but also includes acts committed by secular groups against religious groups. Religious violence, like all violence, is an inherently cultural process whose meanings are context-dependent. Religious violence often tends to place great emphasis on the symbolic aspect of the act. Religious violence is primarily the domain of the violent "actor", which may be distinguished between individual and collective forms of violence. Overall, religious violence is perpetrated for a wide variety of ideological reasons and is generally only one of the contributing social and political factors that leads to unrest. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion . 43 (3).
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 669362405.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 6 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Violence practiced in the name of religion The Crusades were a series of military campaigns fought mainly between Roman Catholic Europe and Muslims .Depicted here is the Siege of Antioch from the First Crusade . sidebar Religious violence covers phenomena in which religion is either the subject or the object of violent behavior .All the religions of the world contain narratives, symbols, and metaphors of violence and war . Religious violence is violence that is motivated by, or in reaction to, religious precepts, texts, or the doctrines of a target or an attacker. It includes violence against religious institutions, people, objects, or events. Religious violence does not exclusively include acts which are committed by religious groups, instead, it includes acts which are committed against religious groups."Violence" is a very broad concept which is difficult to define because it is used against both human and non-human objects. Furthermore, the term can denote a wide variety of experiences such as blood shedding, physical harm, forcing against personal freedom, passionate conduct or language, or emotions such as fury and passion. " Religion " is a complex modern Western concept.Though there is no scholarly consensus over what a religion is, today, religion is generally considered an abstraction which entails beliefs, doctrines, and sacred places. The link between religious belief and behavior is problematic. Decades of anthropological, sociological, and psychological research have all proven the falsehood of the assumption that behaviors directly follow from religious beliefs and values because people's religious ideas are fragmented, loosely connected, and context-dependent just like all other domains of culture and life. In general, religions, ethical systems, and societies rarely promote violence as an end in itself since violence is universally undesirable. At the same time, there is a universal tension between the general desire to avoid violence and the acceptance of justifiable uses of violence to prevent a "greater evil" that permeates all cultures. Religious violence, like all forms of violence, is a cultural process which is context-dependent and very complex. Oversimplifications of "religion" and "violence" often lead to misguided understandings of causes for why some people commit acts of violence and why most people never commit such acts in the first place. Violence is perpetrated for a wide variety of ideological reasons and religion is generally only one of many contributing social and political factors that can lead to unrest. Studies of supposed cases of religious violence often conclude that violence is strongly driven by ethnic animosities rather than by religious worldviews. Due to the complex nature of religion and violence and the complex relationship which exists between them, it is normally unclear if religion is a significant cause of violence.Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion (2nd ed.).In Oppy, Graham (ed.).A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy (First ed.). Peacemaking and the Challenge of Violence in World Religions .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1178356870.
The opening as it stood in 2025 7 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Violence practiced in the name of religion sidebar Not to be confused with Religious persecution .Religious violence covers phenomena in which religion is either the target or perpetrator of violent behavior .All the religions of the world contain narratives, symbols, and metaphors of violence and war and also nonviolence and peacemaking. Religious violence is violence that is motivated by, or in reaction to, religious precepts, texts, or the doctrines of a target or an attacker. It includes violence against religious institutions , people, objects, or events. Religious violence includes both acts which are committed by religious groups and acts which are committed against religious groups.The term “religious violence” has proven difficult to define, however.Violence is a very broad concept, because it is used against both human and non-human entities.Furthermore, violence can have a wide variety of expressions, from blood shedding and physical harm to violation of personal freedoms , passionate conduct or language, or emotional outbursts like fury or passion.Adding to the difficulty, religion is a complex and modern Western concept, one whose definition still has no scholarly consensus. Religious violence, like all forms of violence, is a cultural process which is context-dependent and highly complex. Thus, oversimplifications of religion and violence often lead to misguided understandings of the causes for acts of violence, as well as oversight of their rarity. Violence is perpetrated for a wide variety of ideological reasons, and religion is generally only one of many contributing social and political factors that may foment it. Historical circumstances in conflicts often are not linear, but socially and politically complex.Due to the complex nature of religion, violence, and the relationship between them, it is often difficult to discern whether religion is a significant cause of violence from all other factors.Indeed, the link between religious belief and behavior is not linear.Decades of anthropological , sociological , and psychological research have all concluded that behaviors do not directly follow from religious beliefs and values because people's religious ideas tend to be fragmented, loosely connected, and context-dependent, just like other domains of culture and life. Religions, ethical systems , and societies rarely promote violence as an end in of itself. At the same time, there is often tension between a desire to avoid violence and the acceptance of justifiable uses of violence to prevent a perceived greater evil that permeates a culture. Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion (2nd ed.). Peacemaking and the Challenge of Violence in World Religions . Violence and Religion: Cross-cultural Opinions and Consequences . In Oppy, Graham (ed.). A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy (First ed.). Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept .Discourse on Civility and Barbarity . Peacemaking and the Challenge of Violence in World Religions .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1293322677. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“terror” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 66. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
terror
0
0
0
1
0
0
jihad
0
1
0
0
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
Secularism as a response1,000 characters
Terrorism and Islam2,379 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.