Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

The True Furqan

Wikipedia's first sentence called it “book written in arabic mirroring the qur'an but incorporating elements of traditional christian teachings”. Today it says “book written in arabic that tries to imitate the qur'an while incorporating elements of traditional christian t”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2020 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2020

The True Furqan ( ) is a book written in Arabic mirroring the Qur'an but incorporating elements of traditional Christian teaching.1 According to Baptist News, Al-Mahdy, a member of the executive committee of "Project Omega 2001" released The True Furqan in April 1999 saying that Muslims "have not received the true message of the gospel". The book is attributed to authors who go by the pseudonyms of "Al Saffee" and "Al Mahdee", and was translated into English by Anis Shorrosh , who calls it "a tool to liberate Muslims", and who believes that Muhammad is "the antichrist ". It contains 77 numbered chapters, plus a prologue and epilogue. According to Shorrosh, The True Furqan is an attempt to respond to the challenge in the Quran that none can create a work like it, and incorporates a Christian rather than Islamic message. "This book apparently reproduced the Quranic style so effectively that some who recited it aloud in public areas were thanked by Arab Muslims for having recited the Quran itself." Christian missionary Dr. Ray Register characterized the book as an effective tool for "pre-evangelism" to help "critique the Quran and popular Muslim attitudes toward Jesus and ethical living." American Thinker editor and publisher Thomas Lifson wrote that the book "presents Christian theology in a way that it can be understood and digested by Muslims." but says that some Muslims are offended by the book because they feel that the work mocks Islam and tries to deceive Muslims into accepting The True Furqan . It has been described as "Christian propaganda" since its second verse "starts talking about the Holy Trinity , a thoroughly un-Islamic concept." and The American Muslim called the book a "hoax", saying it represented "a desperate measure to find some way to convert the infidel Muslims since a few hundred years of concerted effort have brought so little success". Other critics called it "poor in quality and ridiculous in content" and "a pathetic attempt to distort the Quranic teaching by reproducing what looks like Quranic verses." Islamic scholars at the University of Tehran have argued that The True Furqan uses a flawed methodology in its attempt to answer the challenge of the inimitability ( Taḥaddi ) of the Quran. Licona draws a parallel between The True Furqan and the Gospel of Barnabas , in that each attempts to emulate the style of the scriptures of one religion in order to advance the doctrinal claims of the other, albeit with the respective roles of Christianity and Islam reversed. Some Islamic believers feel The True Furqan was created by the American or Israeli governments as part of a conspiracy. The Egyptian newspaper Al-Usbū claimed in its December 6, 2004 edition that "The True Koran [ sic ] was drafted with direct Israeli participation and with direct instructions from U.S. President George Bush ." The US State Department strongly rejects allegations of any US government participation in the creation of The True Furqan . According to the translator Anis Shorrosh, "there was no Israeli involvement in the preparation of the book." The importation of the book into India is prohibited. Man in India . 97 (14): 367– 378.2

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 958532954.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “book written in arabic mirroring the qur'an but incorporating elements of traditional christian teachings”. Today it says “book written in arabic that tries to imitate the qur'an while incorporating elements of traditional christian t”. Read the current article and compare.
201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2010, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

book written in arabic mirroring the qur'an but incorporating elements of traditional christian teachings

Now

book written in arabic that tries to imitate the qur'an while incorporating elements of traditional christian t

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report