Shoresh
Menu
Case file

UN Watch

A Geneva-based NGO whose stated mission includes monitoring antisemitism at the United Nations. Through October 6 2023 the opening said UN Watch is "frequently critical of anti-Israel and antisemitic sentiment at the UN and UN-sponsored events." Today the opening says only that UN Watch "denounces what it views as anti-Israel sentiment," with antisemitic dropped, though the word survives three times in the body. A reader arriving now learns the group monitors anti-Israel sentiment and not that its stated mission names antisemitism specifically.
Read line by line and written up by hand.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-01. “antisemitism” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 3.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2015 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2015

UN Watch is a Geneva-based non-governmental organization whose stated mission is "to monitor the performance of the United Nations by the yardstick of its own Charter ". It is an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council and an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information . UN Watch has been active in combating human rights abuses in Democratic Republic of the Congo and Darfur , and has been vocal against abuses in regimes such as China , Venezuela , Cuba and Russia , often using its allotted time at the UNHRC to allow for dissidents and human rights activists to speak.1 UN Watch is also frequently critical of anti-Israel and antisemitic sentiment at the UN and UN-sponsored events.2 The NGO actively monitors the qualifications of candidate countries to United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) elections, and has been particularly critical of the 2015 election of China , Cuba , Russia , and Saudi Arabia . It has been a strong critic of the UNHRC, asserting that many of its members have poor human rights records themselves. UN Watch has described the council as equally bad as or worse than its forerunner, the defunct United Nations Commission on Human Rights .3 The group has been praised by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan , and the Director General of the UN Office in Geneva Sergei Ordzhonikidze has acknowledged "the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all." Agence France-Presse has described UN Watch both as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel" and as a group which "champion[s] human rights worldwide".4 May 6, 2008, NGOs say five nations unfit to serve on UN rights body , AFP 6 May 20085

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 668001258.
Today
“antisemitism” appeared 2 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 3. Read the current article and compare.
201020152020Oct '232025
antisemitism11110
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2010, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

geneva-based ngo whose stated mission is "to monitor the performance of the united nations by the yardstick of

Now

geneva-based non-governmental organization

Where the word went

It left the opening. It did not leave the article. Wikipedia moved it down the page, where a reader arriving from a search result will not reach it.

  • “antisemitism” was in the opening on October 6, 2023. Today 1 remain, 72% of the way down the article.

Sections that no longer exist

This section existed on October 6, 2023. It is gone today. The current article has no similar heading in its place, and the article is shorter overall. So this is not a heading that got renamed, and it is not a topic that got folded into a bigger section. 1 section of 400 characters or more gone since October 6 2023, with the article 3,868 characters shorter.

  • Haiti
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report