Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Gospel of Barnabas

Wikipedia's first sentence called it “work purporting to be a depiction of the life of jesus by his disciple barnabas”. Today it says “non-canonical”.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-03.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

Gospel of Barnabas is a work purporting to be a depiction of the life of Jesus by his disciple Barnabas . The earliest known manuscripts have been dated to the late sixteenth century, and are written in Italian and in Spanish ; although the Spanish version now only survives in an eighteenth century copy.1 It is about the same length as the four canonical gospels put together (the Italian manuscript has 222 chapters); with the bulk being devoted to an account of Jesus' ministry, much of it harmonised from accounts also found in the canonical gospels .2 This work is written from a highly pro- Islamic viewpoint, not only mentioning Muhammad by name, but including the shahada (chapter 39). It is strongly anti- Pauline and anti- Trinitarian in tone. In this work, Jesus, is described as a prophet and not the son of God , while Paul is called "the deceived". Furthermore, the Gospel of Barnabas mentions in detail that Jesus was not crucified but rather raised alive to heaven—a docetist theme found in the Gospel of Peter that was taken up in the Qu'ran —while Judas Iscariot the traitor was crucified instead. These beliefs in particular that Jesus is a prophet of God, not crucified but raised alive, conform with Muslim beliefs. Other passages however directly contradict the text of the Qur'an; as for instance in the account of the Nativity , where Mary is said to have given birth to Jesus without pain; or as in Jesus's ministry, where he permits the drinking of wine and enjoins monogamy . Narrative themes, and some highly distinctive phraseology, are shared with the Divine Comedy of Dante (Ragg). If (as most students surmise) the Gospel of Barnabas is seen as an attempted synthesis of elements from both Christianity and Islam, then sixteenth and seventeenth century parallels can be suggested in Morisco and anti-Trinitarian writings; but there are no known earlier precursors. The Spanish version includes an account of the discovery of the Gospel of Barnabas in the private study of Pope Sixtus V ( 1585 - 1590 ), an account which appears to many students to be historically incongruous; and this, together with paleographic inconsistencies in the surviving Italian manuscript, has led a number of scholars to conclude that the two known manuscripts may have been prepared in support of an exercise in forensic falsification , intended to discredit or incriminate some leading Catholic ecclesiastic in the Roman Curia of the 1590s (David Sox; The Gospel of Barnabas 1984). There are a number of contemporary parallels for such an exercise - most notably the "Casket Letters" supposedly forged to incriminate Mary Queen of Scots . Some scholars who maintain this view consequently dismiss the entire Gospel as a hoax ; but the majority would consider it more likely that the supposed forgers made use of a pre-existing heterodox text.3 The Gospel is considered by the majority of academics (including Christians and some Muslims) to be a pious fraud ; however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work edited to conform to Islam, perhaps Gnostic (Cirillo, Ragg) or Ebionite (Pines) or Diatessaronic (Joosten), and some Muslim scholars consider it genuine. Some Islamic organizations cite it in support of the Islamic view of Jesus ; Islamic views are treated below.4

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17891389.
Today
Wikipedia's first sentence called it “work purporting to be a depiction of the life of jesus by his disciple barnabas”. Today it says “non-canonical”. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

What Wikipedia says this is

Every article opens by defining its subject. This one was redefined since 2005, and today's defining sentence is their current revision.

Then

work purporting to be a depiction of the life of jesus by his disciple barnabas

Now

non-canonical

Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report