Media coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
The word “massacre” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2010. Today the opening carries none. 24 remain further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “massacre” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 24.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2010 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since.Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now.Red text: written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot.1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2010
Media coverage of the conflict has been dogged by allegations of bias on both sides.1 These perceptions of bias, possibly exacerbated by the hostile media effect , have generated more complaints of partisan reporting than any other news topic and have led to a proliferation of media watchdog groups on both sides. The hostile media phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the "Beirut Massacre". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 , 577–585. summary .2
This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 369566654.
The opening as it stood in 2005
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is being pursued not only in the cities, towns, and countryside of Israel and the occupied territories of West Bank and the Gaza Strip with bombs and bullets, it is also a media battle being waged on television and in newspapers and magazines. This article, Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict , is about the coverage of the conflict in the media, and the efforts of all parties involved to win the "war of words". As Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Centre for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University , says, "Wars are won, not only on the battlefield, but also with words." Palestinian politician Hanan Ashrawi told Reuters: "The media are... crucial. It presents a version of reality. It creates awareness of what's happening, and the perceptions that are presented affect public opinion." Yehudith Orbach, head of the journalism and communications department of the same university, points out in an interview (2001) with Reuters that Palestinians and Israelis were fully aware of the importance of media image. In war... television is a battlefield," Orbach told Reuters. The fact that it is a cliché does not mean that it is any less true".
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 17957280.
The opening as it stood in 2015 1 passage from the previous snapshot no longer appear
( Learn how and when to remove this message ) Media coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict by journalists in international news media has been said to be biased by both sides and independent observers. These perceptions of bias, possibly exacerbated by the hostile media effect , have generated more complaints of partisan reporting than any other news topic and have led to a proliferation of media watchdog groups . The hostile media phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the "Beirut Massacre". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 , 577–585. summary .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 668648545.
The opening as it stood in 2020
Media coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict by journalists in international news media has been said to be biased by both sides and independent observers. These perceptions of bias, possibly exacerbated by the hostile media effect , have generated more complaints of partisan reporting than any other news topic and have led to a proliferation of media watchdog groups . The hostile media phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the "Beirut Massacre". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 , 577–585. summary .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 961651488.
The opening as it stood on October 6, 2023 2 passages from the previous snapshot no longer appear
Allegations of bias in media coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict A Reuters armored vehicle that was damaged while reporting on the conflict in 2006, pictured on display at the Imperial War Museum in London Media coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict by journalists in international news media has been said to be biased by both sides and independent observers. These perceptions of bias, possibly exacerbated by the hostile media effect , have generated more complaints of partisan reporting than any other news topic and have led to a proliferation of media watchdog groups .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1176446911.
The opening as it stood in 2025
A Reuters armored vehicle that was damaged while reporting on the conflict in 2006, pictured on display at the Imperial War Museum in London. Media coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been said, by both sides and independent observers, to be biased.This coverage includes news, academic discussion, film, and social media. These perceptions of bias, possibly exacerbated by the hostile media effect , have generated more complaints of partisan reporting than any other news topic and have led to a proliferation of media watchdog groups .
Red text was written in or rewritten since the previous snapshot. Their copy is revision 1292046042. This is our newest snapshot; the live article may have moved again since.
Today
“massacre” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 24. Read the current article and compare.
2005
2010
2015
2020
Oct '23
2025
massacre
0
1
1
1
0
0
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Sections that no longer exist
Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.
Decontextualization742 characters
Forgery or falsification665 characters
Exaggeration or sensationalism714 characters
Other criticisms1,112 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.
