Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Succession to Muhammad

The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none. 1 remains further down the article, where a reader arriving from a search result does not go.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 1.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

In 632, the Islamic prophet Muhammad died in the Arabian city of Medina , after a brief illness. After an initial period of confusion, command of the Muslim community was taken by Abu Bakr , Muhammad's father-in-law and one of his long-time supporters and companions. Muslims in later centuries disagreed sharply as to how this transition was made and whether or not it was legitimate. On the one side are the Muslims known as Shi'a , or Shi'at Ali, the party of Ali. They believe that Ali ibn Abi Talib , Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, was the proper successor, and had been designated as such by Muhammad. On the other side are the Muslims known as Sunni , who argue that Abu Bakr was chosen by the community, and that this method of choosing or electing leaders had been endorsed by Muhammad. The events of 632 were transmitted orally for more than a century; the first written records date from a period long after the disputed succession. Indeed, they date from the beginning of the Abbasid line of caliphs , who had overthrown the previous Ummayad line, claiming historical justification in the events of the succession and the careers of the first four caliphs. The histories were thus composed in a sectarian milieu, for intensely political purposes. They have since been interpreted and elaborated by several Islamic groups, the Sunni and the various Shi'a sects. It is extremely difficult to give a historical account of this event without descending into the thick of partisan controversy. This article attempts to summarize the sources and arguments for particular versions of the succession to Muhammad. It does not intend to arbitrate and discuss who should have succeeded Muhammad. It only attempts to report the various viewpoints and beliefs of groups involved.1

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17404085.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today the opening has none; the body has 1. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
disputed111000
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.

Sections that no longer exist

Present on 6 October 2023, absent today. A heading can vanish because the section was deleted or because it was renamed or merged, and we have not separated those here, so treat this as a list of what to check rather than a verdict.

  • Ansar's meeting 679 characters
  • Abu Bakr's remarks 539 characters
  • Violence at the Saqifa 538 characters
  • Consolidation 456 characters
  • Ali's opposition 1,695 characters
  • Criticism 826 characters
  • Hadith of warning 1,012 characters
  • Hadith of position 705 characters
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report