Shoreshthe drift report · all case files
Case file

Women as imams

The word “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak in 2005. Today the opening carries none, and neither does the rest of the article, references included.
Measured, not asserted. Every count, date and revision on this page was taken from Wikipedia's own history and checked against the live article. The words quoted are theirs.
Machine-checked against the full current article on 2026-08-02. “disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included.
We saved snapshots of this article over twenty years; you are reading the 2005 one. Red dashes: removed from Wikipedia since. Pale dots: rewritten; the numbered note shows what it says now. 1 tap a number or a side note to jump between them
The opening as it read in 2005

There is a current controversy among Muslims on the circumstances in which women may act as imams - that is, lead a congregation in salat (prayer.) Three of the four Sunni schools, as well as many Shia , agree that a woman may lead a congregation consisting of women alone in prayer, although the Maliki school does not allow this.1 According to all currently existing traditional schools of Islam , a woman cannot lead a mixed congregation in salat (prayer).2 Some schools make exceptions for Tarawih (optional Ramadan prayers) or for a congregation consisting only of close relatives. Certain medieval scholars - including Al-Tabari (838-932), Abu Thawr (764-854), Al-Muzani (791-878), and Ibn Arabi (1165-1240) - considered the practice permissible at least for optional ( nafila ) prayers; however, their views are not accepted by any major surviving group.3 Some Muslims in recent years have reactivated the debate, arguing that the spirit of the Qur'an and the letter of a disputed hadith indicate that women should be able to lead mixed congregations as well as single-sex ones, and that the prohibition of this developed as a result of sexism in the medieval environment, not as a part of true Islam.4

This is Wikipedia's own text, saved in our repository. Their copy of it is revision 17294680.
Today
“disputed” appeared 1 times in this article's opening at its peak. Today it appears nowhere in the article, references included. Read the current article and compare.
2005201020152020Oct '232025
disputed111000
Counts in the opening at each snapshot. Green: the word gained ground. Red: it was cut. Grey: no change.
Struck red text is no longer in the article; dotted amber text was rewritten. Every revision id links to Wikipedia's copy; the text shown is our own saved copy. Data: /data. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA; quoted for the record; not affiliated with Wikipedia.

← back to the drift report